Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:57:08.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advancing Employee Resilience Research: Additional Thoughts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Natalie E. Wolfson  and
Casey Mulqueen
Natalie E. Wolfson*
Affiliation:
TRACOM Group, Centennial, Colorado
Casey Mulqueen
Affiliation:
TRACOM Group, Centennial, Colorado
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Natalie E. Wolfson, TRACOM Group, 6675 South Kenton Street, Suite 118, Centennial, CO 80111. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Britt, Shen, Sinclair, Grossman, and Klieger (2016) draw attention to issues in the psychological literature regarding how we define, assess, select for, and build employee resilience. We offer a handful of recommendations for complementing and expanding on these important issues. Specifically, we propose that research should include more common forms of workplace adversity, versus extreme and rare types of adversity; resilience should be assessed via objective multirater methodology rather than subjective self-report; because context is important when studying resilience, researchers should delineate the purposes of the research; resilience should be treated as a malleable rather than a fixed characteristic; and finally, the field would benefit from qualitative research in addition to quantitative research.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 452 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bass, B. M., & Yammarino, F. J. (1991). Congruence of self and others’ leadership ratings of Naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology, 40, 437–454.Google Scholar
Britt, T. W., Shen, W., Sinclair, R. R., Grossman, M. R., & Klieger, D. M. (2016). How much do we really know about employee resilience? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 378–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. J., & Begley, S. (2012). The emotional life of your brain: How its unique patterns affect the way you think, feel, and live–and how you can change them. New York, NY: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. G, & Aaron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517.Google Scholar
Eyal, T., & Epley, N. (2010). How to seem telepathic: Enabling mind reading by matching construal. Psychological Science, 21, 700–705.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43–62.Google Scholar
Hodliff, M. (2014). The development and validation of the employee resilience scale (EmpRes): The conceptualization of a new model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Idris, M. K. (2011). Over time effects of role stress on psychological strain among Malaysian public university academics. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 154–161.Google Scholar
Karimi, R., Omar, Z. B., Alipour, F., & Karimi, Z. (2014). The influence of role overload, role conflict, and role ambiguity on occupational stress among nurses in selected Iranian hospitals. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4 (1), 34–40.Google Scholar
MabeP. A., III P. A., III, & West, S. G. (1982).Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risucci, D. A., Torolani, A. J., & Ward, R. J. (1989). Ratings of surgical residents by self, supervisors and peers. Surgical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 169, 519–526.Google Scholar
Ungar, M. (2003). Qualitative contributions to resilience research. Qualitative Social Work, 2, 85–102.Google Scholar