Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:23:21.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When and Why Correcting Validity Coefficients for Interrater Reliability Makes Sense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2015

Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 501 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2005). Applied psychology in human resource management (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Hardison, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Mitchell, T. W. (2002, April). Customer ratings of performance: A useful criterion for validation research? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., Scherer, K. T., & James, L. R. (2014). Corrections for criterion reliability in validity generalization: A false prophet in a land of suspended judgment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(4), 478–500.Google Scholar
McLellan, R. A., Schmidt, M., Amundson, M., & Blake, R. (1998, May). Secret shopper as an individual-level criterion for validation studies. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & DeShon, R. (2000). Interrater correlations do not estimate the reliability of job performance ratings. Personnel Psychology, 53(4), 873–900.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H. N. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 499.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 557.Google Scholar