Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T19:17:28.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Victim Precipitation and the Wage Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Shannon Cheng ,
Abigail Corrington ,
Mikki Hebl ,
Linnea Ng  and
Ivy Watson
Shannon Cheng
Affiliation:
Rice University
Abigail Corrington
Affiliation:
Rice University
Mikki Hebl*
Affiliation:
Rice University
Linnea Ng
Affiliation:
Rice University
Ivy Watson
Affiliation:
Rice University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mikki Hebl, Department of Psychology, Rice University, MS-25, Houston, TX 77005. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Cortina, Rabelo, and Holland (2018) accurately cite the general public's overuse of victim precipitation ideologies, or the notion that victims engage in actions that directly bring about their unfortunate circumstances. These ideologies also have permeated industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology and the study of people in the workplace (e.g., women's choice in clothing leads to sexual harassment, certain target characteristics and actions incite workplace bullying). We agree with Cortina et al. that this ideology unintentionally benefits the perpetrator by placing blame and responsibility for nonoptimal workplace situations directly on the target. The field of I-O psychology needs to move away from this model of victim blaming as a remediation for workplace disparities.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 144 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

All authors contributed to this manuscript equally and author order was determined alphabetically.

References

American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2016). The simple truth about the gender pay gap. Retrieved from: http://www.aauw.org/aauw_check/pdf_download/show_pdf.php?file=The-Simple-Truth Google Scholar
Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2009). Women don't ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Pipeline's broken promise. New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2011). The myth of the ideal worker: Does doing all the right things really get women ahead? New York: Catalyst.Google Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Rabelo, V. C., & Holland, K. J. (2018). Beyond blaming the victim: Toward a more progressive understanding of workplace mistreatment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ely, R. J., Stone, P., & Ammerman, C. (2014, December). Rethink what you “know” about high-achieving women. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/12/rethink-what-you-know-about-high-achieving-women Google Scholar
Ewart, S. (2012, February). What it's worth: Field of training and economic status in 2009 (current population reports). U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-129.pdf Google Scholar
Franke, L. (2015, November 5). How the gender pay gap widens as women get promoted. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2015/11/how-the-gender-pay-gap-widens-as-women-get-promoted Google Scholar
Goldin, C. (2015). How to achieve gender equality in pay. The Milken Institute Review. Retrieved from: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goldin/files/gender_equality.pdf Google Scholar
Hegewisch, A., Liepmann, H., Hayes, J., & Hartmann, H. (2010). Separate and not equal? Gender segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap (IWPR Briefing Paper). Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.Google Scholar
Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010, September). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2010/09/why-men-still-get-more-promotions-than-women Google Scholar
Institute for Women's Policy Research. (2017, April). The gender wage gap by occupation 2016 and by race and ethnicity (Fact Sheet). Retrieved from: https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/C456.pdf Google Scholar
Kantor, J., Fuller, T., & Scheiber, N. (2016, April 6). Why parental leave policies are changing. New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/us/why-parental-leave-policies-are-changing.html?_r=1 Google Scholar
King, E. B., Botsford, W. E., Hebl, M., Kazama, S., Perkins, A., & Dawson, J. (2012). Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. Journal of Management, 38, 1835–1866.Google Scholar
Laughlin, L. (2011, October). Maternity leave and employment patterns of first-time mothers: 1961–2008 (current population reports). U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-128.pdf Google Scholar
Lopez, M. H., & Gonzalez-Barrera, A. (2014, March 6). Women's college enrollment gains leave men behind. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/03/06/womens-college-enrollment-gains-leave-men-behind/ Google Scholar
Madera, J. M., King, E., & Hebl, M. (2013). Enhancing the effects of sexual orientation training: The effects of setting goals and training mentors on attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28 (1), 79–91.Google Scholar
Misra, J., Hickes Lundquist, J., Holmes, E., & Agiomavritis, S. (2011). The ivory ceiling of service work. American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from: https://www.aaup.org/article/ivory-ceiling-service-work#.WaYFcGPADm0 Google Scholar
Miller, C. C. (2016, March 18). As women take over a male-dominated field, the pay drops. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/upshot/as-women-take-over-a-male-dominated-field-the-pay-drops.html?mcubz=3&_r=0 Google Scholar
Nittrover, C. L., Hebl, M. R., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R. C. E., Lane, D. M., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States of America, 115 (1), 104–108.Google Scholar
Noël, L., & Arscott, C. H. (2015). ICEDR special report: What executives need to know about millennial women. ICEDR. Retrieved from: https://www.icedr.org/research/documents/15_millennial_women.pdf Google Scholar
O'Connor, E., & Ettinger, H. (2015). Women and wealth: What do female breadwinners want? Family Wealth Advisors Council. Retrieved from: http://familywealthadvisors.council.com/breadwinner-women/.Google Scholar
Okahana, H., Feaster, K., & Allum, J. (2016). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2005 to 2015. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.Google Scholar
Pradel, D. W., Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2006, February 13). When gender changes the negotiation. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge. Retrieved from: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/when-gender-changes-the-negotiation Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solnick, S. J. (2001). Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry, 39 (2), 189–200.Google Scholar
Staff, J., & Mortimer, J. T. (2012). Explaining the motherhood wage penalty during the early occupational career. Demography, 49 (1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Trump-Steele, R., Corrington, A., Nittrouer, C., & Hebl, M. (2017). Convincing men that gender equity matters. Unpublished manuscript, Rice University.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. (2016). Income and poverty in the United States: 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2016/demo/income-poverty/p60-256.html Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor and Statistics. (2017, June). American time use survey summary. Retrieved from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.nr0.htm Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2015). The global gender gap report 2015. Retrieved from: http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2015/ Google Scholar