Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:43:15.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Value of Connecting Diversity in Organizations and Cross-Cultural Work Psychology Through Dialogue and Multiplicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Bernardo M. Ferdman  and
Lilach Sagiv
Bernardo M. Ferdman*
Affiliation:
Alliant International University
Lilach Sagiv*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant International University, 10455 Pomerado Rd., San Diego, CA 92130, USA
E-mail: [email protected], Address: School of Business Administration, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, 91905 Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In our focal article (Ferdman & Sagiv, 2012), we suggested that increased dialogue and connection between researchers and practitioners focused on diversity in organizations and those focused on cross-cultural work psychology could be beneficial to growth and advancement in both fields. The thoughtful and intriguing commentaries to the article are heterogeneous both in the topics they focus on and in their relative emphasis on theory versus practice, and in our view support our call for more dialogue. In this response, we address some of the key issues the commentaries stimulated for us, including the notion of integration versus homogenization and the differential role of values in research in each field. We summarize by highlighting, as did many of the commentaries, the importance of multiple and diverse approaches and perspectives, a value consistent with both fields.

Type
Response
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 373 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper was written in full collaboration; authorship is listed in alphabetical order. Sagiv's work on this article was supported by a grant from the Recanati Fund of the School of Business Administration at the Hebrew University.

References

Adams, R., Licht, A., & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1331–1355. Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5–68. Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 615–631. Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M., & Bujaki, M. (1989). Acculturation attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38, 185–206. Google Scholar
Butts, C. C., Trejo, B., Parks, K. M., & McDonald, D. P. (2012). The integration of diversity and cross-cultural work: Competencies and commonalities. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 361–364. Google Scholar
Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 105–153.Google Scholar
Feitosa, J., Grossman, R., Coultas, C. W., Salazar, M. R., & Salas, E. (2012). Integrating the fields of diversity and culture: A focus on social identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 365–368.Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M. (1992). The dynamics of ethnic diversity in organizations: Toward integrative models. In Kelley, K. (Ed.), Issues, theory and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 339–384). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M. (1995). Cultural identity and diversity in organizations: Bridging the gap between group differences and individual uniqueness. In Chemers, M. M., Oskamp, S., & Costanzo, M. (Eds.), Diversity in organizations: New perspectives for a changing workplace (pp. 37–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M. (1999). The color and culture of gender in organizations: Attending to race and ethnicity. In Powell, G. N. (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 17–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M. (2000). “Why am I who I am?” Constructing the cultural self in multicultural perspective. Human Development, 43, 19–23. Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M. (2003). Learning about our and others' selves: Multiple identities and their sources. In Boyacigiller, N. A., Goodman, R., & Phillips, M. (Eds.), Crossing cultures: Insights from master teachers (pp. 49–61). London, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M., & Sagiv, L. (2012). Diversity in organizations and cross-cultural work psychology: What if they were more connected? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 323–345. Google Scholar
Gallegos, P. V., & Ferdman, B. M. (2012). Latina and Latino ethnoracial identity orientations: A dynamic and developmental perspective. In Wijeyesinghe, C. L. & Jackson, B. W. (Eds.). New perspectives on racial identity development: Integrating emerging paradigms into racial identity models. New York, NY: New York University Press. Google Scholar
Gandal, N., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2005). Personal value priorities of economists. Human Relations, 58, 1227–1252. Google Scholar
Graen, G., Hui, C., & Wakabayashi, M. (2012). Manager-direct report alliances as a context for integrating cross-cultural and diversity research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 368–370. Google Scholar
Gurevitch, Z. D. (1989). The power of not understanding: The meeting of conflicting identities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25, 161–173. Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.xGoogle Scholar
King, E. B., Kravitz, D. A., McCausland, T., & Paustian-Underdahl, S. (2012). Values cannot be ignored. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 354–357. Google Scholar
Lopez, P. D. J., & Finkelman, J. M. (2012). A distinction without a difference? Why synergies between diversity and cross-cultural psychology benefit global organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 349–351. Google Scholar
Madera, J. M., King, E. B., & Hebl, M. R. (2012). Bringing social identity to work: The influence of manifestation and suppression on perceived discrimination, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 165–170. DOI: 10.1037/a0027724.Google Scholar
Nkomo, S., & Stewart, M. M. (2006). Diverse identities in organizations. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 520–540). London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar
Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., & Goren, M. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or colorblindness better for minorities? Psychological Science, 20, 444–446. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x.Google Scholar
Prasad, A. (2012). Research commensurability: Or, the loss of analytical precision. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 352–354. Google Scholar
Proudford, K. L., & Nkomo, S. (2006). Race and ethnicity in organizations. In Konrad, A. M., Prasad, P., & Pringle, J. K. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 323–344). London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar
Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Arieli, S. (2011). Personal values, national culture and organizations: Insights applying the Schwartz Value Framework. In Ashkanasy, N. N., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. F. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate (2nd ed, pp. 515–537). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Sawyer, K., & Thoroughgood, C. (2012). Culture doesn't just intersect with diversity, culture defines diversity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 346–348. Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). Cultural value differences: Some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Journal, 48, 23–47. Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Values: Individual and cultural. In Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Shemla, M., & Meyer, B. (2012). Bridging diversity in organizations and cross-cultural work psychology by studying perceived differences. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 370–372. Google Scholar
Wilson, K. Y., & Schwabenland, C. (2012). International and intranational cultures in organizations: Overlapping or contested terrain? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 357–361. Google Scholar
Zanoni, P., Janssens, M., Benschop, Y., & Nkomo, S. (2010). Unpacking diversity, grasping inequality: Rethinking difference through critical perspectives. Organization, 17, 9–29. DOI: 10.1177/1350508409350344.Google Scholar