Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:14:34.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Validity of Individual Psychological Assessments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Scott B. Morris ,
Ilianna H. Kwaske  and
Rebecca R. Daisley
Scott B. Morris*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology
Rebecca R. Daisley
Affiliation:
Advocate Health Care
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Illinois Institute of Technology, 3105 S. Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 322 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Potosky, D. (1999). Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 52, 561–589. Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1991). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Google Scholar
De Corte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2008). Validity and adverse impact potential of predictor composite formation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 183–194. Google Scholar
Dreher, G. F., Ash, R. A., & Hancock, P. (1988). The role of the traditional research design in underestimating the validity of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 315–327. Google Scholar
Farr, J. L., & Tippins, N. T. (2010). Handbook of employee selection. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323. Google Scholar
Hammer, A. L., & Schnell, E. R. (2000). Firo-B Technical Guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. (2002). Assessing the candidate as a whole: A historical and critical analysis of individual psychological assessment for personnel decision making. Personnel Psychology, 55, 363–396. Google Scholar
Jeanneret, R., & Silzer, R. (1998). An overview of individual psychological assessment. In Jeanneret, R. & Silzer, R. (Eds.), Individual psychological assessment: Predicting behavior in organizational settings (pp. 3–26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Kwaske, I. H., & Morris, S. B. (2008, April). Validating individual assessments: A multilevel, multistage validation of individual assessments. In I. H. Kwaske (Chair), Individual assessment: Does the research support the practice? Symposium presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Prien, E. P., Schippmann, J. S., & Prien, K. O. (2003). Individual assessment as practiced in industry and consulting. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Psychological Corporation. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Psychological Corporation. (1980). Wesman personnel classification test. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Roller, R. L., & Morris, S. B. (2008). Individual assessment: Meta-analysis. In I. H. Kwaske (Chair), Individual assessment: Does the research support the practice? Symposium presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., & Baron, H. (2006). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359–392. Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1987). A survey of individual assessment practices by I/O psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 40, 455–488. Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1992). Relationships between graduate training, professional affiliation, and individual psychological assessment practices for personnel decisions. Personnel Psychology, 45, 363–387. Google Scholar
Silzer, R., & Jeanneret, R. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: A practice and science in search of common ground. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 270–296.Google Scholar
Van Iddekinge, C. H., Sager, C. E., Burnfield, J. L., & Heffner, T. S. (2006). The variability of criterion-related validity estimates among interviewers and interview panels. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 193–205. Google Scholar