Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:22:41.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Dark Side Personality Traits to Identify Potential Failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Dev K. Dalal  and
Kevin P. Nolan
Dev K. Dalal*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
Kevin P. Nolan
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 434 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentz, V. J. (1967). The Sears experience in the investigation, description, and prediction of executive behavior. In Wickert, F. R. & McFarland, D. E. (Eds.), Measuring executive effectiveness (pp. 147–205). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Burke, R. J. (2006). Why leaders fail: Exploring the darkside. International Journal of Manpower, 27, 91–100.Google Scholar
Denton, J. M., & Van Lill, J. B. (2006). Managerial derailment. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 3, 231–250.Google Scholar
Gentry, W. A., & Shanock, L. R. (2008). Views of managerial derailment from above and below: The importance of a good relationship with upper management and putting people at ease. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2469–2494.Google Scholar
Hogan, R. (1994). Trouble at the top: Causes and consequences of managerial incompetence. Consulting Psychology Journal, 46, 1061–1087.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493–504.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40–51.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9, 169–180.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In Langan-Fox, J., Cooper, C. L., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms. Northampton, MA: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
Kolar, D. W., Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1996). Comparing the accuracy of personality judgments by the self and knowledgeable others. Journal of Personality, 62, 311–337.Google Scholar
McCauley, C. D., & Lombardo, M. M. (1990). BENCHMARKS: An instrument for diagnosing managerial strengths and weaknesses. In Clark, K. E. & Clark, M. B. (Eds.), Measures of leadership. West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.Google Scholar
Moregesn, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 638–729.Google Scholar
Silzer, R., & Church, A. H. (2009). The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 377–412.Google Scholar
The OSS Assessment Staff (1948/2006). Assessment of men: Selection of personnel from The Office of Strategic Services [Reprinted in 2006]. St. Petersburg, FL: Hailer.Google Scholar
Wagerman, S. A., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 221–229.Google Scholar