No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Teaching I-O psychology for the greater good
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
References
Kath, L., Salter, N., Bachiochi, P., Brown, K., & Hebl, M (2021). Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(4), 443–460.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2003). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand the values of organizational psychology to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010). Industrial-organizational psychology’s recurring identity crises: It’s a values issue! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2014). Educating industrial-organizational psychologists for science, practice, and social responsibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zickar, M. J. (2010). Recognizing the need for a humanistic movement within industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar