Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:25:23.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STRETCH Goals for I-O Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Julie B. Olson-Buchanan  and
Tammy D. Allen
Julie B. Olson-Buchanan*
Affiliation:
California State University, Fresno
Tammy D. Allen
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Julie B. Olson-Buchanan, 5245 N. Backer MS PB 7 Craig School of Business, CSUF Fresno, Fresno, CA 93740-8001. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gloss, Carr, Reichman, Abdul-Nasiru, and Oestereich (2017) present a compelling argument (or rallying call) for there being a “moral imperative for I-O psychology to overrepresent people living in the deepest forms of poverty in both science and practice” (p. 330). We agree. Our research has been dominated by a POSH perspective, and it is incumbent upon us to ensure that our science benefits those who are most affected by poverty. We believe the interest in engaging in humanitarian work psychology is growing among industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists, yet many of us may not feel prepared to conduct such research and/or we may feel that we lack the skills to do so. Further, as Gloss et al. (2017) note, to the extent that we are unprepared to engage in research that benefits those living in poverty, in particular, we run the added risk of harming the very populations we are wanting to help. As such, the interest is there, but we may be daunted by the method. We argue that in order to heed that rallying call, without harm, we need to develop our own capabilities to engage in this important work.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 370 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. D. (2015). Connections past and present: Bringing our scientific influence into focus. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 52, 126–133.Google Scholar
Amerson, R. M., & Strang, C. W. (2015). Addressing the challenges of conducting research in developing countries. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47, 584–591.Google Scholar
Balestrery, J. E. (2016). Social work education without walls: Ethnography as a lens for transformative learning. Social Work Education, 35 (6), 615–631.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial–organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9 (1), 84–113. doi: 10.1017/iop.2015.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bemal, G., Cumba-Avilés, E., & Rodriguez-Quintana, N. (2014). Methodological challenges in research with ethnic, racial, and ethnocultural groups. In Leong, F. T. L. (Ed.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology, Vol. 1: Theory and research (pp. 105–123). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.Google Scholar
Doucet, F., Grayman-Simpson, N., & Shapses Wertheim, S. (2013). Steps along the journey: Documenting undergraduate White women's transformative processes in a diversity course. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 6 (4), 276–291.Google Scholar
Elias, D. (1997). It's time to change our minds: An introduction to transformative learning. ReVision, 20 (1). Retrieved from https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-20167133.html Google Scholar
Gloss, A., Carr, S. C., Reichman, W., Abdul-Nasiru, I., & Oesterich, W. T. (2017). From handmaidens to POSH humanitarians: The case for making human capabilities the business of I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (3), 329–369.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32, 3–23.Google Scholar
Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Bryan, L. L. K., & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.). (2013). Using industrial-organizational psychology for the greater good: Helping those who help others. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G., & Bonaccio, S. (2016). Qualitative research in I-O psychology: Maps, myths, and moving forward. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (4), 693–715. doi: 10.1017/iop.2016.92.Google Scholar
Schein, V. E. (2003). The functions of work-related group participation for poor women in developing countries: An exploratory look. Psychology and Developing Societies, 15 (2), 123–142.Google Scholar
Thompson, T., Lamont-Robinson, C., & Williams, V. (2016). At sea with disability! Transformative learning in medical undergraduates voyaging with disabled sailors. Medical Education, 50 (8), 866–879.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. E., Scharrón-del Río, M., & Casillas, D. M. (2013). Ethical matters and contentions in the principled conduct of research with ethnocultural communities. In Leong, F. T. L. (Ed.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology, Vol. 1: Theory and research (pp. 59–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Tung, R. L. (1981). Selection and training of personnel for overseas assignments. Columbia Journal of World Business, 16 (1), 68–78.Google Scholar