Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:54:22.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Six Questions That Practitioners (Might) Have About Ideal Point Response Process Items

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Dev K. Dalal ,
Scott Withrow ,
Robert E. Gibby  and
Michael J. Zickar
Dev K. Dalal*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
Scott Withrow
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
Robert E. Gibby
Affiliation:
Procter & Gamble
Michael J. Zickar
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 498 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. Google Scholar
Carter, N. T., & Dalal, D. K. (2010). An ideal point account of the JDI Work satisfaction scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 743–748.Google Scholar
Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88–106. Google Scholar
Drasgow, F., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. (2010). 75 years after Likert: Thurstone was right! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 465–476.Google Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for us in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121. Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1932). The method of constructing an attitude scale. Archives of Psychology, 140, 44–53. Google Scholar
Roberts, J. S., Donoghue, J. R., & Laughlin, J. E. (2000). A generalized item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 3–32. Google Scholar
Roberts, J. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996). A unidimensional item response model for unfolding responses from a graded disagree–agree response scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 231–255. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529–554. Google Scholar