Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:06:52.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robust Science: A Review of Journal Practices in Industrial-Organizational Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Justin R. Feeney
Justin R. Feeney*
Affiliation:
Hill and Levene Schools of Business, University of Regina
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Justin R. Feeney, Edu Bldg, Bus. Admin (5th Floor), University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The focal article (Grand et al., 2018) provides an exemplary roadmap for improving the practice of robust science in industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology, which includes recommendations for authors such as practicing robust science, even in the absence of reward. However, authors are faced with practical constraints; to succeed in our field, we must publish, at least occasionally, in prestigious journals to secure scholarships, awards, employment, grants, and tenure. We can practice robust science (commonly referred to as “open science” or “reproducible research”) without reward—but only to some extent, if there is no support from our gatekeepers. After all, it is difficult to influence the field without a job and research funding.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 48 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarivate Analytics. (2017). 2016 Journal Citation Reports® Social Sciences Edition. Boston: Author.Google Scholar
Grand, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, T. D., Landis, R. S., Reynolds, D. H., Scott, J. C., . . . Truxillo, D. M. (2018). A systems-based approach to fostering robust science in industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (1), 4–42.Google Scholar
Harzing, A. W. (2017). Journal Quality List (60th Ed.). London: Author. Retrieved from https://harzing.com/resources/journal-quality-list Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., . . . Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348 (6242), 1422–1425. doi:10.1126/science.aab2374 Google Scholar
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (8), 1023–1036. doi:10.1177/0146167208318067 Google Scholar