Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:01:45.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resolving ethical dilemmas is a matter of developing our practical wisdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2021

Georgi P. Yankov*
Affiliation:
Development Dimensions International (DDI)
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. (D. Ross, Trans., introduction and notes by Lesley Brown). Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 350 B.C.E.).Google Scholar
Donagan, A. (1996) Moral dilemmas, genuine and spurious: A comparative anatomy. Ethics, 104, 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2021). Forms of ethical dilemmas in industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(3), 297319.Google Scholar
Lockwood, T. C. (2013). Habituation, habit, and character in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. In Sparrow, T. & Hutchinson, A. (Eds.), A history of habit: From Aristotle to Bourdieu (pp. 1936). Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Macintyre, A. (1990). Moral Dilemmas. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, supp. vol. 50, 367382.Google Scholar