No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Professionalizing the Diversity and Inclusion Practice: Putting the Horse Before the Cart
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 January 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013
References
Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836–874.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In Schmitt, N., Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
CEB (2012). Creating competitive advantage through workforce diversity. Arlington, VA: Corporate Executive Board.Google Scholar
Dunnette, M. D. (1963). A note on “the” criterion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays-Thomas, R., & Bendick, M. Jr. (2013). Professionalizing diversity and inclusion practice: Should voluntary standards be the chicken or the egg? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 193–205.Google Scholar
Kampa-Kokesch, S., & Anderson, M. Z. (2001). Executive coaching: A comprehensive review of the literature. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53, 205–228.Google Scholar
Sherman, S., & Freas, A. (2004). The wild west of executive coaching. Harvard Business Review, 82, 82–90.Google Scholar
SHRM. (2013, March 5). Active standards projects. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/hrstandards/activestandardsprojects/pages/default.aspxGoogle Scholar