Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:19:37.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preserving the Integrity of Online Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Eugene Burke
Eugene Burke*
Affiliation:
SHL Group Ltd.
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: SHL Group Ltd., The Pavilion, 1 Atwell Place, Thames Ditton, Surrey KT7 0NE, United Kingdom.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 35 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association (1996). The rights and responsibilities of test takers: Guidelines and expectations. Washington. DC: Author. Retrieved on July, 28, 2008 from www.apa.org/science/ttrr.html Google Scholar
Automatic Data Processing Inc. (2008). 2008 ADP screening index. Retrieved on July, 28, 2008 from www.adp.com/media/press-releases/2008-news-releases/adp-annual-pre-employment-screening-index.aspx Google Scholar
Burke, E. (2006). Better practice for online assessment. Thames Ditton, UK: SHL. Retrieved on July 28, 2008 from www.shl.com/SHL/en-int/Thought_Leadership/White_Papers/White-Papers.aspx Google Scholar
Burke, E. (2008, April). Preserving the integrity of online testing. In N. T. Tippins (Chair), Internet testing: Current issues, research solutions, guidelines, and concerns . Symposium conducted at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Burke, E., Van Someren, G., & Tatham, N. (2006). Verify range of ability tests: Technical manual. Thames Ditton, UK: SHL. Retrieved on July, 28, 2008 from www.shl.com/SHL/en-int/Products/Access_Ability/Access_Ability_List/verify.aspx Google Scholar
Burke, E., & Wright, D. (2008, January). Defending the validity of online tests in an era of cheating and piracy. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Division of Occupational Psychology of the British Psychological Society, Stratford-upon-Avon, UK.Google Scholar
Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410601520Google Scholar
Levitt, S. D., & Dubner, S. J. (2005). Freakonomics. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tippins, N. T. (2008, April). Internet testing: Current issues, research solutions, guidelines, and concerns. Symposium presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Tippins, N. T., Beaty, J., Drasgow, F., Gibson, W. M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D. O., et al. (2006). Unproctored Internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59, 189–225.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00909.xGoogle Scholar
Vargas, P. T., Von Hippel, W., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Using partially structured measures to enhance the attitude-behavior relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 97–211.10.1177/0146167203259931Google Scholar
Von Hippel, W., Lakin, J. L., & Shakarchi, R. J. (2005). Individual differences in motivated social cognition: The case of self-serving information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1347–1357.10.1177/0146167205274899Google Scholar