Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:01:24.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Our Scholarly Practices Are Derailing Our Progress: The Importance of “Nothing” in the Organizational Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ronald S. Landis*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology
Steven G. Rogelberg
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
*
E-mail: [email protected]Address: Illinois Institute of Technology, 3105 S. Dearborn St., Life Sciences #252, Chicago, IL 60616

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68, 314316.Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organization psychology in a changing world of work. American Psychologist, 50, 928939.Google Scholar
Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(3), 252268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruschke, J. K., Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012). The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 722752.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2010). Organizational psychology and the tipping point of professional identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 241258.Google Scholar