Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:46:04.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nothing So Practical as a Good Justice Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Deborah E. Rupp  and
Karl F. Aquino
Deborah E. Rupp*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Karl F. Aquino
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: School of Labor and Employment Relations, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 504 East Armory Drive, Champaign, Illinois USA 61820
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 205 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

School of Labor and Employment Relations, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

**

Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia.

Authors contributed equally to this manuscript. Correspondence may be sent to either author.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R., Williams, C., Conley, J., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 147–158.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00495.xGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, R., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.10.5465/amr.2007.25275678Google Scholar
Aquino, K., Skarlicki, D. P., Freeman, D., Nadisic, T., & Fortin, M. (2009). The lives of others: The role of moral identity in third parties’ emotional, cognitive, and behavioral reactions to injustice. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria for justice. In Sheppard, B. (Ed.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., Conlon, D. E., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 1019–1024.10.1002/job.228Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. In Ferris, J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 20, pp. 1–113). New York, NY: JAI.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In Greenberg, J. & Cropanzano, R. (Eds.), Advances in organization justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
French, W. (1964). The personnel management process: Human resources administration. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gilliland, S. W. (2008). The tails of justice: A critical examination of the dimensionality of organizational justice constructs. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 271–281.10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.08.001Google Scholar
Gilliland, S. W., & Paddock, L. (2005). Organizational justice across human resource management decisions. In Ford, J. K. & Hodgkinson, G. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 149–176). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Goldman, B., Slaughter, J., Schmit, M., Wiley, J., & Brooks, S. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of discrimination claims: A multiple needs model perspective. Journal of Management, 34, 952–977.10.1177/0149206308318613Google Scholar
Grant, A., Rupp, D. E.,&Turban, D. B. (2009, April). The science and practice of corporate social responsibility: What I–O psychologists can contribute, Research incubator presented at the 24th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2009). Everybody talks about organizational justice but nobody does anything about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 181–195.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01131.xGoogle Scholar
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254–280.10.1177/000765030003900302Google Scholar
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. (1990). The core competency of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91.Google Scholar
Lavelle, J., Rupp, D. E., & Brockner, J. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management, 33, 841–866.10.1177/0149206307307635Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Justice in social relationships. In Thibaut, J. W., Spence, J. T., & Carson, R. C. (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211–240). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers . In Cartwright, D. (Ed.). Oxford, UK: Harpers.Google Scholar
Liao, H., & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate, climate strength, and justice orientation on work outcomes: A multilevel-multifoci framework. Journalof Applied Psychology, 90, 242–256.10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242Google Scholar
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738–748.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder indentification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management, 22, 853–886.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. A. (2005). Gamma, beta, and alpha change in individuals following a developmental assessment center. Unpublished dissertation, Colorado State University.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Baldwin, A. M., & Bashshur, M. R. (2006). Using developmental assessment centers to foster workplace fairness. Psychologist-Manager Journal, 9, 145–170.10.1207/s15503461tpmj0902_6Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Bashshur, M., & Liao, H. (2007). Justice climate: Consideration of the source, target, specificity, and emergence. In Dansereau, F. & Yammarino, F. (Eds.), Research in multilevel issues (Vol. 6, pp. 439–459). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C. (in press). Retribution, moral self regulation and self interest in the decision to punish: A moral motives extension of the deontic model of justice. Business Ethics Quarterly.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). Multifoci justice and social exchange relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925–946.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Williams, C., Aguilera, R. (in press). Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance): An application of organizational justice, self-determination, and social influence theories. In Schminke, M. (Ed.). Managerial Ethics. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Schminke, M. (2009, April). Behavioral ethics: Linking managerial ethics and corporate social responsibility. Symposium presented at the 24th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Cropnanzo, R. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 294–304.10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.294Google Scholar
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 839–865.10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00032-8Google Scholar
Weaver, G. L., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552.Google Scholar