Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T15:10:31.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leadership Skills for Managing Paradoxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Wendy K. Smith  and
Marianne W. Lewis
Wendy K. Smith*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Marianne W. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: University of Delaware, Alfred Lerner College of Business and Economics, 203 Alfred Lerner Hall, Newark, DE 19716
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 227 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20, 696–717.Google Scholar
Besharov, M., & Smith, W. K. (2011). Conflicting logics in hybrid organizations: A process model of internal organizational responses. Working paper.Google Scholar
Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In Quinn, R. & Cameron, K. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J. III. (1997). How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Business Review, 75, 77.Google Scholar
Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O’Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflict. Academy of Management Review, 34, 32–55.Google Scholar
Graham, P. (Ed.). (1996). Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
Holt, K., & Seki, K. (2012). Global leadership: A developmental shift for everyone. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 198–217.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (2004). Confidence: How winning streaks and losing streaks begin and end. New York, NY: Crown Business. Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.Google Scholar
Luscher, L., & Lewis, M. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 221–240.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2007). The opposable mind: How successful leaders win through integrative thinking. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456–493.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Smith, K., & Berg, D. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass. Google Scholar
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522–536.Google Scholar
Stone, D., Patton, B., & Heen, S. (1999). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most. New York, NY: Viking. Google Scholar
Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In Sutton, R. I. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 81–123). Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar