Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:14:27.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I-O Psychology and management journal prestige in business schools: Do institutional versus individual views differ?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

In-Sue Oh*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Resource Management, Fox School of Business, Temple University
Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Phil Bobko, Huy Le, Phil Roth, and Frank Schmidt for their comments on an early version of this commentary.

References

Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, W. H., Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (2007). Making a life in the field of organization science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 817835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., & Melick, S. R. (2020). Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 273290.Google Scholar