Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:00:13.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In our English-only research world, there is a need for reviewers who are tolerant of imperfect texts from non-anglophone authors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2020

Cornelius J. König Open the ORCID record for Cornelius J. König [Opens in a new window]  and
Nida ul Habib Bajwa
Cornelius J. König*
Affiliation:
Universität des Saarlandes
Nida ul Habib Bajwa
Affiliation:
Universität des Saarlandes
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 54 - 56
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bajwa, N. ul H., & König, C. J. (2019). How much is research in the top journals of industrial/organizational psychology dominated by authors from the U.S.? Scientometrics, 120, 1147–1161. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03180-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, N. ul H., König, C. J., & Harrison, O. S. V. (2016). Toward evidence-based writing advice: Using applied linguistics to understand reviewers’ expectations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15, 419–434. doi: 10.5465/amle.2015.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, N. ul H., Langer, M., König, C. J., & Honecker, H. (2019). What might get published in management and applied psychology? Experimentally manipulating implicit expectations of reviewers regarding hedges. Scientometrics, 120, 1351–1371. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03164-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belcher, D. D. (2007). Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. L. (2011). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boussebaa, M., & Tienari, J. (in press). Englishization and the politics of knowledge production in management studies. Journal of Management Inquiry. doi: 10.1177/1056492619835314Google Scholar
Burgess, T. F., & Shaw, N. E. (2010). Editorial board membership of management and business Journals: A social network analysis study of the Financial Times 40. British Journal of Management, 21, 627–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00701.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Industrial and organizational psychology 1963–2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1062–1081. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happell, B. (2011). Responding to reviewers’ comments as part of writing for publication. Nurse Researcher, 18(4), 23–27. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.07.18.4.23.c8632CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113–135. doi: 10.1017/S0267190502000065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, T., González-Morales, M. G., Banks, G. C., O’Boyle, E., Allen, J. A., Sinha, R., … Gulick, L. M. V. (2020). Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. A. (2014). Addressing reviewer comments as an integrative negotiation. Management and Organization Review, 10, 183–190. doi: 10.1111/more.12061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín, P., Rey-Rocha, J., Burgess, S., & Moreno, A. I. (2014). Publishing research in English-language journals: Attitudes, strategies and difficulties of multilingual scholars of medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2015). Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education, 40, 106–122. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.818641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J. J., Girolamo, T., Spychalska, M., & Berkson, K. H. (2016). Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 149–170. doi: 10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, W., Kiger, T. B., Davies, S. E., Rasch, R. L., Simon, K. M., & Ones, D. S. (2011). Samples in applied psychology: Over a decade of research in review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1055–1064. doi: 10.1037/a0023322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, P. (2019). Shakespeare and the English poets: The influence of native speaking English reviewers on the acceptance of journal articles. Publications, 7(1), 20. doi: 10.3390/publications7010020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourish, D. (in press). The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education. doi: 10.5465/amle.2019.0255Google Scholar