Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2018
As a practitioner with 25 years of experience applying industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology concepts to address business challenges, I want to expand upon the point that “robust science is relevant” (Grand et al., 2018, p. 10)—specifically, that making two changes in the field's research direction could greatly increase the impact, value, and credibility of I-O psychology in the broader world of work.
Target article
A Systems-Based Approach to Fostering Robust Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology
Related commentaries (7)
Enough Talk, It's Time to Transform: A Call for Editorial Leadership for a Robust Science
If Robust Science Is Relevant Science, Then Make I-O Psychology Research More Relevant: Thoughts From a Practitioner Point of View
In Defense of HARKing
Open Science Is Robust Science
Robust Science: A Review of Journal Practices in Industrial-Organizational Psychology
The Last Line of Defense: Corrigenda and Retractions
The Role of Professional Associations in Promoting Robust Science