Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:33:35.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Humanistic Viewpoint on Use-Inspired Motivation Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jennifer Z. Gillespie
Jennifer Z. Gillespie*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 115 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University.

References

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., & Hulin, C. L. (2008). Motivation for what: A multivariate, dynamic perspective of the criterion. In Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.), Motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 63–100). New York: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096–1127.10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. (2009). Work motivation: Identifying use-inspired research directions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 77–93.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.01112.xGoogle Scholar
Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (2008a). The three C’s of work motivation: Content, context, and change. In Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.), Motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 1–16). New York: Taylor Francis.10.4324/9780203809501Google Scholar
Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (2008b). Work motivation: Forging new perspectives and directions in the post-millennium. In Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.), Motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 601–632). New York: Taylor Francis.10.4324/9780203809501Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand the values of organizational psychology to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–453.10.1002/job.527Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E. (2008). The measurement and analysis of motivation: Looking past, moving forward. In Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.), Motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 17–62). New York: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar