Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T14:34:39.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Fruitful Framework: Commentary for a More Integrative Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2017

Juliana M. Klein  and
Erick P. Briggs
Juliana M. Klein*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University
Erick P. Briggs
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Juliana M. Klein, Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, 3700 Lindell Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63108. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Compared with more turbulent times in history, some might argue workplace discrimination has seen a downward trend. Others would contend that workplace discrimination has “just gone underground” and become more covert (Herring, 2002, p. 13). Either way, not-so-distant historical events such as the landmark Texaco case in 1996 and the Ford Motor case in 2000 remind us that discrimination demands our attention. Calls for research on interventions have surfaced (Becker, Zawadzki, & Shields, 2014), and proposals such as legal reforms, implicit bias training (Bartlett, 2009), and experiential learning workshops have answered (Cundiff, Zawadzki, Danube, & Shields, 2014). The focal article (Jones, Arena, Nittrouer, Alonso, & Lindsey, 2017) contributes to this discussion as it turns our attention to the construct space of discrimination and presents a framework for organizing its facets and forms. Without a doubt, a framework that lends itself to the integration of the many forms of discrimination is long overdue.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 123 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, K. (2009). Making good on good intentions: The critical role of motivation in reducing implicit workplace discrimination. Virginia Law Review, 95 (8), 1893–1972.Google Scholar
Becker, J. C., Zawadzki, M. J., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Confronting and reducing sexism: A call for research on intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70 (4), 603–614.Google Scholar
Cundiff, J. L., Zawadzki, M. J., Danube, C. L., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70 (4), 703–721.Google Scholar
Hebl, M. R., Foster, J. B., Mannix, L. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Formal and interpersonal discrimination: A field study of bias toward homosexual applicants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 815–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, C. (2002). Is job discrimination dead? Contexts, 1 (2), 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying . . . oh my!” A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32 (3), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. P., Arena, D. F., Nittrouer, C. L., Alonso, N. M., & Lindsey, A. P. (2017). Subtle discrimination in the workplace: A vicious cycle. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (1), 51–76.Google Scholar
Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2004, August). A multi-level model of incivility in the workplace. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Neuman, J. H. (2004). Injustice, stress, and aggression in organizations. In Griffin, R. W. & O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 62–102). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.Google Scholar