Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:53:25.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring Workplace Resilience Through a Personality Strength Lens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Jennifer P. Green ,
David M. Wallace  and
Amber K. Hargrove
Jennifer P. Green*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University
David M. Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University
Amber K. Hargrove
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer P. Green, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Resilience research has primarily focused on occupations that undergo a significant amount of stress, such as the military or trauma teams. In response, Britt, Shen, Sinclair, Grossman, and Klieger (2016) call for “future work on resilience to expand to include a wider cross section of workers and occupations” (p. 397). We suggest that viewing resilience through a personality strength lens will facilitate this expansion. Adopting a personality strength approach to resilience will more clearly (a) link the capacity for resilience to positive adaptation in the face of a broader range of stressors beyond objectively significant adversity and (b) open up new methods of investigating the demonstration of resilience.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 447 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Britt, T. W., Shen, W., Sinclair, R. R., Grossman, M. R., & Klieger, D. M. (2016). How much do we really know about employee resilience? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 378–404.Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Meyer, R. D., Bradshaw, R. P., Green, J. P., Kelly, E. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). Personality strength and situational influences on behavior: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 261–287. doi:10.1177/0149206314557524Google Scholar
Eschleman, K. J., Bowling, N. A., & Alarcon, G. M. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of hardiness. International Journal of Stress Management, 17, 277–307. doi:10.1037/a0020476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, D. L., Wiebe, D. J., Fillingim, R. B., & Shay, K. A. (1989). Life events, fitness, hardiness, and health: A simultaneous analysis of proposed stress-resistance effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 136–142. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.136Google Scholar
Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330–343. doi:10.1037/a0019796Google Scholar
Suls, J., Martin, R., & David, J. P. (1998). Person–environment fit and its limits: Agreeableness, neuroticism, and emotional reactivity to interpersonal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 88–98. doi:10.1177/0146167298241007Google Scholar