Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:43:55.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence-Based I–O Psychology: Not There Yet but Now a Little Nearer?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Rob B. Briner  and
Denise M. Rousseau
Rob B. Briner*
Affiliation:
University of London
Denise M. Rousseau
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Organizational Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our focal article sought to promote discussion of evidence-based approaches to practice in industrial–organizational (I–O) psychology. It did so by describing the meanings and origins of evidence-based practice, evaluating the extent to which I–O psychology practice is currently evidence-based, and considering the role of systematic reviews in promoting evidence-based practice. The commentaries on our focal article raised many interesting and important points. In our response, we divide them into two broad categories. The first category consists of comments and objections that arise from what we believe to be misinterpretations of evidence-based practice and our focal article. The second category contains those comments that in various ways extend and elaborate the issues raised in our focal article. Although we are not there yet, we hope that these commentaries will take us a little nearer to an evidence-based approach to I–O psychology.

Type
Response
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 76 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2011). The kryptonite of evidence-based I–O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 40–44.Google Scholar
Baratz, L. (1965). The servants of power: A history of the use of social science in American industry. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Bartlett, D. (2011). The neglect of the political: An alternative evidence-based practice for I–O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 27–31.Google Scholar
Bartunek, J. M. (2011). Evidence-based approaches in I–O psychology should address worse grumbles. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 72–75.Google Scholar
Baughman, W. A., Dorsey, D. W., & Zarefsky, D. (2011). Putting evidence in its place: A means not an end. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 62–64.Google Scholar
Boatman, J. E., & Sinar, E. F. (2011). The path forward to meaningful evidence. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 68–71.Google Scholar
Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: Construct clean-up time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 19–32. Google Scholar
Burke, M. J. (2011). Is there a fly in the “systematic review” ointment? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 36–39.Google Scholar
Cassell, C. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: What do we lose on the way? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 23–26.Google Scholar
Catano, V. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Lessons from clinical psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 45–48.Google Scholar
Cronin, M. A., & Klimoski, R. (2011). Broadening the view of what constitutes “evidence.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 57–61.Google Scholar
Guzzo, R. A. (2011). The universe of evidence-based I–O psychology is expanding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 65–67.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P. (2011). Why evidence-based practice in I–O psychology is not there yet: Going beyond systematic reviews. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 49–53.Google Scholar
Potworowski, G., & Green, L. A. (2011). Assessing the uptake of evidence-based management: A systems approach. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 54–56.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & Boudreau, J. (in press). Doing research that is useful for theory and practice–25 years later. In Lawler, E. E. & Morhrman, S. A. (Eds.), Doing useful research (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler. Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through reflective reviews. Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, 475–515. Google Scholar
Thayer, A. L., Wildman, J. L., & Salas, E. (2011). I–O psychology: We have the evidence; we just don't use it (or care to). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 32–35.Google Scholar