Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:29:04.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Performance and the Performance–Performance Rating Relation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jochen Reb  and
Gary J. Greguras
Jochen Reb*
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
Gary J. Greguras*
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
*
E-mail: [email protected] (J.R.); [email protected] (G.J.G.), Address: Singapore Management University, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, 50 Stamford Road, Singapore 178899
E-mail: [email protected] (J.R.); [email protected] (G.J.G.), Address: Singapore Management University, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, 50 Stamford Road, Singapore 178899
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 194 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Singapore Management University, Lee Kong Chian School of Business

Both authors contributed equally to this commentary

References

DeNisi, A., & Stevens, G. E. (1981). Profiles of performance, performance evaluations, and personnel decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 592–602.Google Scholar
Ghiselli, E. E., & Haire, M. (1960). The validation of selection tests in the light of dynamic character of criteria. Personnel Psychology, 13, 225–231.Google Scholar
Kane, J. S. (1986). Performance distribution assessment. In Berk, R. A. (Ed.), Performance assessment: Methods and applications (pp. 237–273). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, J. S. (1996). The conceptualization and representation of total performance effectiveness. Human Resource Management Review, 6, 123–145.10.1016/S1053-4822(96)90016-9Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2008). Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 148–160.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Reb, J., & Cropanzano, R. (2007). Evaluating dynamic performance: The influence of salient gestalt characteristics on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 490–499.10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.490Google Scholar
Reb, J., & Greguras, G. J. (2007). Dynamic performance, ratings, and attributions: Frequently discussed but infrequently investigated. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.Google Scholar
Scott, W. E. Jr., & Hamner, W. C. (1975). The influence of variations in performance profiles on the performance evaluation process: An examination of the validity of the criterion. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 360–370.Google Scholar