Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:57:31.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity and Inclusion Science and Practice Requires an Interdisciplinary Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jeffrey M. Cucina ,
Sharron Thompson Peyton ,
Lauren L. Clark ,
Chihwei Su  and
Benjamin E. Liberman
Jeffrey M. Cucina*
Affiliation:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Sharron Thompson Peyton
Affiliation:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Lauren L. Clark
Affiliation:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Chihwei Su
Affiliation:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Benjamin E. Liberman
Affiliation:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1400 L Street, NW, 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–1145
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 221 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, P., Deines, D., Plumblee, R. D., & Xanthaky Larson, C. (1997). Introduction to accounting: An integrated approach. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2011). 2011 APA Member Profiles. Washington, DC: APA Center for Workforce Studies. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/workforce/publications/11-member/index.aspxGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. L., & Taylor, H. F. (2008). Sociology: Understanding a diverse society (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Avery, D. R. (2007). Does underrepresented = understudied? Recent research on racial and ethnic minorities in I-O psychology. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 44(3), 75–80.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. (2009). Recruiting talent using web 2.0. IPMA-HR/IPAC Joint Conference, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Bernabei, L. & Kabat, A. R. (2012, July 23). Invasions of privacy. Retrieved from http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202563811801&Invasions_of__privacy&slreturn=20120623081008Google Scholar
Bernal, G., Trimble, J. E., Burlew, A. K., & Leong, F. T. (2002). Handbook of racial and ethnic minority psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betley, W., Norton, L., & Orozco, R. A. (2011, July). Social media in the workplace: Employer guidelines for limiting liability for tweets gone bad. Paper presented at the International Personnel Assessment Council Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011a). Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity, 2010. (Report 1032). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011b). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/earnings.htm and http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2011/ted_20110914.htmGoogle Scholar
Chugh, D., & Brief, A. P. (2008). Where the sweet spot is: Studying diversity in organizations. In Brief, A. P. (Ed.), Diversity at work (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and White students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5(2), 115–124.Google Scholar
Cullen, M. J., Hardison, C. M., & Sackett, P. R. (2004). Using SAT-grade and ability-performance relationships to test predictions derived from stereotype threat theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 220–230.Google Scholar
Department of Homeland Security. (2011). 2011 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Washington, DC: Office of Immigration Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2011/ois_yb_2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Derous, E., Nguyen, H. H., & Ryan, A. M. (2009). Hiring discrimination against Arab minorities: Interactions between prejudice and job characteristics. Human Performance, 22, 297–320.Google Scholar
Derous, E., Nguyen, H. H., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Multiple categorization in resume screening: Examining effects on hiring discrimination against Arab applicants in field and lab settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 544–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derous, E., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Documenting the adverse impact of resume screening: Degree of ethnic identification matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 464–474.Google Scholar
Du, W. (2007, August 14). Job candidates getting tripped up by Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20202935/ns/business-school_inc_/t/job-candidates-getting-tripped-facebook/#.UA_pcaDn5I1Google Scholar
EEOC v. Target Corporation, No. 04–3559. 460 F.3d 946, 960–62 (7th Circ., 2006).Google Scholar
El-Hakem v. BJY Inc., 415 F.3d 1068, 1073 (9th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2006). EEOC compliance manual—Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination. (Directives Transmittal No. 915.003). Washington, DC: Office of Legal Counsel, Title VII/ADEA/EPA Division, EEOC. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/race-color.htmlGoogle Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2010). Fact sheet on employment tests and selection procedures. Washington, DC: EEOC. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/factemployment_procedures.htmlGoogle Scholar
Farnham, A. (2011, June 24). Background checks now include twitter, facebook. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Business/job-tweets-background-checks-employers-now-include-postings/story?id=13908874#.UA_pt6Dn5I1Google Scholar
Ferdman, B. M., & Sagiv, L. (2012). Diversity in organizations and cross-cultural work psychology: What if they were more connected? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5(3), 323–345.Google Scholar
Friedlob, G. T., & Welton, R. E. (1995). Keys to reading an annual report (2nd ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Barron's Educational Series.Google Scholar
Gatewood, R. D., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Human resource selection. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Green, T. K. (2003). Discrimination in workplace dynamics: Toward a structural account of disparate treatment theory. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 38(1), 91–157.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review (2010). Leading cases. Harvard Law Review, 124(1), 179–410.Google Scholar
Hays-Thomas, R., & Bendick, M. Jr. (2013). Professionalizing diversity and inclusion practice: Should voluntary standards be the chicken or the egg? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 193–205.Google Scholar
Hazen, L., & Syrdahl, J. (2010). Dress codes and appearance policies: What not to wear at work. The Colorado Lawyer, 39(9), 55–63.Google Scholar
Healey, J. F. (2012). Race, ethnicity, gender, and class: The sociology of group conflict and change (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (2012). The Oxford handbook of work and aging. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475, 480 n.12 (1954).Google Scholar
Hosoda, M., Nguyen, L. T., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (2012). The effect of Hispanic accents on employment decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(4), 347–364.Google Scholar
King, E. B., & Cortina, J. M. (2010). The social and economic imperative of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered supportive organizational policies. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3(1), 69–78.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Landy, F. J. (2008). Stereotypes, bias, and personal decisions: Strange and stranger. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(4), 379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, D. (2005, January 15). Bank of America survey asks workers about sexual orientation. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Bank-of-America-survey-asks-workers-about-sexual-2705535.phpGoogle Scholar
Leong, F. T. L., Inman, A. G., Ebreo, A., Yang, L. H., Kinoshita, L., & Fu, M. (2006). Handbook of Asian American psychology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479.Google Scholar
Neville, H. A., Tynes, B. M. & Utsey, S. O. (2008). Handbook of African American Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ogbu, J. U. (1978). Minority education and caste: The American system in cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Carnegie Council on Children Publications/Academic Press.Google Scholar
Orhorhaghe v. INS, 38 F.3d 488, 503 (9th Cir. 1994).Google Scholar
Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Phelps, R. P. (2009). Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Rein, L. (2012, May 8). Federal workers survey asks their sexual orientation. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-workers-survey-asks-their-sexual-orientation/2012/05/08/gIQADOwvAU_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rosenbloom, S. (2008, May 1). Status: Looking for work on facebook. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/fashion/01networking.html?_r=1&pagewanted=allGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, J. M. (1996). The cultural landscape: An introduction to human geography (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ruggs, E. N., Law, C., Cox, C. B., Roehling, M. V., Wiener, R. L., Hebl, M. R., & Barron, L. (2013). Gone fishing: I–O psychologists' missed opportunities to understand marginalized employees' experiences with discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saari, L. M., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2011). Identified employee surveys: Potential promise, perils, and professional practice guidelines. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4(4), 435–448.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 238–241.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.Google Scholar
Stricker, L. J. (2006, October). Stereotype threat on cognitive tests. Paper presented at the 48th annual conference of the International Military Testing Association, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Stricker, L. J. (2008). The challenge of stereotype threat for the testing community. (Research Memorandum # RR-08-12). Princeton, NJ: ETS.Google Scholar
Stricker, L. J., & Ward, W. C. (2004). Stereotype threat, inquiring about test takers' ethnicity and gender, and standardized test performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 665–693.Google Scholar
Stricker, L. J., & Ward, W. C. (2008). Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined: A reply. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1656–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
The Newspaper Guild of New York—Local 31003, CWA. (2010, October 14). Survey asks workers about their sexual orientation, disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.nyguild.org/reuters-news-details/items/survey-asks-workers-to-out-themselves-on-their-sexual-orientation-and-disabilities.htmlGoogle Scholar
Vash, C. L., & Crew, N. M. (2004). Psychology of disability. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Villarruel, F. A., Carlo, G., Grau, J. M., Azmita, M., Cabrera, N. J., & Chahin, T. J. (2009). Handbook of U.S. Latino psychology: Developmental and community-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Walters, A. M., Lee, S., & Trapani, C. (2004). Stereotype threat, the test-center environment, and performance on the GRE General Test. (Research Report # RR-04-37). Princeton, NJ: ETS.Google Scholar
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weed, J. (2009, May 30). Finding new employees, via social networks. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/jobs/31recruit.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wei, T. E. (2009). Stereotype threat, gender, and math performance: Evidence from the national assessment of educational progress. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic630262.files/sthreat_naep.pdfGoogle Scholar
WUSA. (2012, May 19). Federal sex survey. [Television broadcast]. Washington, DC: WUSA. Retrieved from http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=204847Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1903). Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics. Biometrika, 2(2), 121–134.Google Scholar