Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T13:10:59.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critically evaluating the use of dark trait measurement in selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Sydney L. Reichin Open the ORCID record for Sydney L. Reichin [Opens in a new window] ,
Elizabeth M. Grimaldi  and
James M. LeBreton
Sydney L. Reichin*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Elizabeth M. Grimaldi
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
James M. LeBreton
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 163 - 166
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnes v. Cochran , 130 F.3d 443 (Court of Appeals 1997).Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2000). Enforcement Guidance: Disability-related inquiries and medical examinations of employees under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/guidance-inquiries.html#N_33_ Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. construction of the schedule. Journal of Psychology, 10, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karraker v. Rent-A-Center, Inc ., 411 F.3d 831 (7th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Grimaldi, E. M. (2018). The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, C. S., Schmitt, D. S., Carter, R., Embley, I., & Hare, R. D. (2012). Psychopathic traits in females and males across the globe. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 557–574. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2038 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melson-Silimon, A., Harris, A. M., Shoenfelt, E., Miller, J. D., & Carter, N. T. (2019). Personality testing and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Cause for concern as normal and abnormal models are integrated. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2016). Manual for the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy scale. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson v. Borg-Warner Protective Servs. Corp ., No. C-94-4015 MHP, 1996 W.L. 162990 (1996).Google Scholar
Williams, K. M., Paulhus, D. L., & Hare, R. D. (2007). Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 205–219. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268074 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed