Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:50:35.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corporate Social Responsibility, Industry, and Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Marc Orlitzky*
Affiliation:
UniSA Business School
Jie Shen
Affiliation:
UniSA Business School
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: UniSA Business School, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(4), 314332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 771792.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumptions of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312317.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dunnette, M. D. (1966). Fads, fashions, and folderol in psychology. American Psychologist, 21, 343352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, R. H. (1996). Can socially responsible firms survive in a competitive environment?. In Messick, D. M., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics (pp. 86103). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business & Society, 33, 150164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 33.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2005). Making philanthropy out of obscenity. Reason, 37(5), 3233.Google Scholar
Gilad, B. (2004). Early warning: Using competitive intelligence to anticipate market shifts, control risk, and create powerful strategies. New York, NY: AMACOM.Google Scholar
Hasnas, J. (1998). The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 1942.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, H. (1952). Economics in one lesson. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.Google Scholar
Hendry, J. (2001). Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 159176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36(5), 3844.Google Scholar
Levy, D. L., & Kaplan, R. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and theories of global governance: Startegic contestation in global issue arenas. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 432451). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcoux, A. M. (2003). A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 124.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J., & Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171194.Google Scholar
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404424.Google Scholar
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603609.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894904.Google Scholar
Munk, N. (1999, April 12). How Levi's trashed a great American brand. Fortune, 139, 8289.Google Scholar
Nohria, N., Piper, T., & Gurtler, B. (2006). Malden Mills (A) and (B). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Oberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). “Why don't consumers care about CSR?” A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449460.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Employee green behaviors. In Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (Eds.), Managing HR for environmental sustainability (pp. 85116). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M. (2005). Social responsibility and financial performance: Trade-off or virtuous circle? University of Auckland Business Review, 7(1), 3743.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M. (in press). Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. Academy of Management Perspectives.Google Scholar
Orlitzky, M., & Swanson, D. L. (2006). Socially responsible human resource management: Charting new territory. In Deckop, J. R. (Ed.), Human resource management ethics (pp. 325). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Orts, E. W., & Strudler, A. (2010). Putting a stake in stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 605615.Google Scholar
Pedersen, E. R., & Andersen, M. (2006). Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: How codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs, 6(3-4), 228240.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 6178.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 5668.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 7892.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 6277.Google Scholar
Rodgers, T. J. (2005). Put profits first. Reason, 37(5), 3335.Google Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. (2011). Good strategy, bad strategy: The difference and why it matters (1st ed.). New York, NY: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537543.Google Scholar
Shen, J., & Zhu, J. H. (2011). Effects of socially responsible HRM on employee organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 30203035.Google Scholar
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16(1), 2744.Google Scholar