Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:13:07.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The conundrum of industrial-organizational psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Joel Lefkowitz Open the ORCID record for Joel Lefkowitz [Opens in a new window]
Joel Lefkowitz*
Affiliation:
Bernard M. Baruch College and the Graduate Center, CUNY
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 473 - 478
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspective, August, 10–23. doi: 10.5465/amp.24.3.11Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2003; Amended 2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. A., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial-organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(1), 84–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danley, J. R. (1994). The role of the modern corporation in a free society. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Frederick, W. C. (1995). Values, nature, and culture in the American corporation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gelles, D., & Yaffe-Bellany, D. (2019, August 20). Feeling heat, C.E.O.s pledge new priorities. New York Times, A1, 15.Google Scholar
Hackman, R. J., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hertwig, R., & Engel, C. (2016). Homo ignorans: Deliberately choosing not to know. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, A. (1947). Industrial psychology as management technique and as social science. American Psychologist, 2, 224–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefkowitz, J. (1990). The scientist-practitioner model is not enough. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 28, 47–52.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2003). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2005). The values of industrial-organizational psychology: Who are we? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43(2), 13–20.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand the values of organizational psychology to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2009). Promoting employee justice: It’s even worse than that! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010). Industrial-organizational psychology’s recurring identity crises: It’s a values issue! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3(3), 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2011). The science, practice and morality of work psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4(1), 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2012a). From humanitarian to humanistic work psychology: The morality of business. In Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & Furnham, A. (Eds.), Humanitarian work psychology: Alignment, harmonization and cultural competence (pp. 103–125). London, UK: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2012b). The impact of practice values on our science. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 50(2), 16–22.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2013a). Values of I-O psychology; Another example: What and whom we don’t study and what it all suggests about the profession. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 51(2), 46–56.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2013b). Values and ethics of a changing I-O psychology: A call to (further) action. In Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Koppes Bryan, L. L., & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), Using I-O psychology for the common good: Helping those who help others (pp. 13–42). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2014). Educating industrial-organizational psychologists for science, practice, and social responsibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(1), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2016a). News flash! Work psychology discovers workers! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(1), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2016b). The maturation of a profession: A work psychology for the new millennium. In McWha-Herman, I., Maynard, D. C., & Berry, M. O. (Eds.), Humanitarian work psychology and the global development agenda (pp. 200–204). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2017). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Mumby, D. K. (2019). Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing)—a critical theorist’s perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(4), 429–443.Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. P. (1989). Changing unethical organizational behavior. Academy of Management EXECUTIVE, III(2), 123–130.Google Scholar
Roback, A. A. (1917). The moral issues involved in applied psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorkin, A. R. (2019, August 20). Pact foresees return to era of scruples. New York Times, B1, 4.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (1999). Justice and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. (2019, August 21). Yes, C.E.O.s can fix capitalism. New York Times, A25.Google Scholar