Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T02:22:28.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considering the interaction of individual differences and remote work contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2021

Darrin Grelle  and
Eric Popp
Darrin Grelle*
Affiliation:
SHL
Eric Popp
Affiliation:
SHL
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (alternate email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Special Issue 1-2: Special Pandemic Issue , June 2021 , pp. 244 - 247
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77–88.10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonnell, R., O’Neill, T., Kline, T., & Hambley, L. (2009). Bringing group-level personality to the electronic realm: A comparison of face-to-face and virtual contexts. Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887150802371773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2011). Individual virtual competence and its influence on work outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. C. (2020, May 11). The pandemic has exposed the fallacy of the ideal worker. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/05/the-pandemic-has-exposed-the-fallacy-of-the-ideal-worker Google Scholar