Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:24:16.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Considerations Related to Intentionality and Omissive Acts in the Study of Workplace Aggression and Mistreatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

John Fiset*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University of Newfoundland
Melanie A. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Management, HEC Montréal
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to John Fiset, Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1B 3X5, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

Extract

We applaud the efforts of Cortina, Rabelo, and Holland (2018) in their development of perpetrator predation as a sensitizing concept (see also Cortina, 2017) for future work in workplace aggression and mistreatment (hereafter workplace mistreatment). The importance of being mindful of the manner in which we frame our arguments is both highly relevant and well-articulated by the authors. We further believe that the transfer of focus from that of blaming victims to placing the onus for workplace mistreatment on the actor him/herself is an important idea as our field continues to develop into the 21st century.

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452471. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.2202131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M. (2017). From victim precipitation to perpetrator predation: Towards a new paradigm for understanding workplace aggression. In Bowling, N. A. & Hershcovis, M. S. (Eds.), Research and theory on workplace aggression (pp. 121135). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Rabelo, V. C., & Holland, K. J. (2018). Beyond blaming the victim: Toward a more progressive understanding of workplace mistreatment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 6480 doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferris, D. L., Chen, M., & Lim, S. (2017). Comparing and contrasting workplace ostracism and incivility. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 315338. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., Djurdjevic, E., Chang, C. H. D., & Tan, J. A. (2013). When is success not satisfying? Integrating regulatory focus and approach/avoidance motivation theories to explain the relation between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98 (2), 342353. doi:10.1037/a0029776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying . . . oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32 (3), 499519. doi:10.1002/job.689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershcovis, M. S., & Reich, T. C. (2013). Integrating workplace aggression research: Relational, contextual, and method considerations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S26S42. doi:10.1002/job.1886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jex, S. M., & Bayne, A.M. (2017). Measurement of workplace aggression. In Bowling, N. A & Hershcovis, M. S. (Eds.), Research and theory on workplace aggression (pp. 933). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (3), 483496. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social psychological perspective. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 1340). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, J., Robinson, S. L., Berdahl, J. L., & Banki, S. (2014). Is negative attention better than no attention? The comparative effects of ostracism and harassment at work. Organization Science, 26 (3), 774793. doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S. L., O'Reilly, J., & Wang, W. (2013). Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism. Journal of Management, 39 (1), 203231. doi:10.1177/0149206312466141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Schabram, K. (2017). Invisible at work: Ostracism as aggression. In Bowling, N. A. & Hershcovis, M. S. (Eds.), Research and theory on workplace aggression (pp. 221244). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarraf, R. C., Hershcovis, M. S., & Bowling, N. A. (2017). Moving the field of workplace aggression forward: Thoughts and recommendations. In Bowling, N. A. and Hershcovis, M. S. (Eds.), Research and theory on workplace aggression (pp. 350369). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar