Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:01:00.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conceptual Versus Empirical Distinctions Among Constructs: Implications for Discriminant Validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

James K. Harter*
Affiliation:
The Gallup Organization
Frank L. Schmidt
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: The Gallup Organization, 1001 Gallup Drive, Omaha, NE 68103

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Workplace Management, The Gallup Organization

**

Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888918.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2007). Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 15421556.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305325.Google Scholar
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268279.Google Scholar
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Killham, E., & Asplund, J. A. (2007). The relationship between employee engagement and performance: Recent meta-analytic findings across industry, organizational unit types and countries. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530541.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376407.Google Scholar
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692724.Google Scholar
Le, H., Schmidt, F. L., Lauver, K., & Harter, J. K. (2007). Empirical re-examinations of the relationships between the constructs underlying measures of job attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Le, H., Schmidt, F. L., & Putka, D. J. (in press). The multifaceted nature of measurement artifacts and its implications for estimating construct-level relationships. Organizational Research Methods. (Available online at http://orm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/1094428107302900v1).Google Scholar
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 330.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire—A cross national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701716.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Ilies, R. (2003). Beyond alpha: An empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. Psychological Methods, 8, 206224.Google Scholar
Wagner, R., & Harter, J. K. (2006). 12: The elements of great managing. Washington, DC: Gallup Press.Google Scholar