Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:14:09.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clarifying the Concept and Context of Content Validation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Brian H. Kim  and
Frederick L. Oswald
Brian H. Kim*
Affiliation:
Occidental College
Frederick L. Oswald
Affiliation:
Rice University
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 497 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Occidental College

**

Department of Psychology, Occidental College, 1600 Campus Rd, F-11, Los Angeles, CA 90041–3314

References

Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.Google Scholar
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 478–494.Google Scholar
Buster, M. A., Roth, P. L., & Bobko, P. (2005). A process for content validation of education and experience-based minimum qualifications: An approach resulting in federal court approval. Personnel Psychology, 58, 771–799.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. North Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Deadrick, D. L., Bennett, N., & Russell, C. J. (1997). Using hierarchical linear modeling to examine dynamic performance criteria over time. Journal of Management, 23, 745–757.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K., & Daniel, M. H.. (1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low IQ groups. Intelligence, 13, 349–359.Google Scholar
Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 616–627.Google Scholar
Dudley, N. M., & Cortina, J. M. (2008). Knowledge and skills that facilitate the personal support dimension of citizenship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1249–1270.Google Scholar
Eyring, J. D., Johnson, D. S., & Francis, D. J. (1993). A cross-level units of analysis approach to individual differences in skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 805–814.Google Scholar
Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 30–42.Google Scholar
Guion, R. M. (1978). “Content validity” in moderation. Personnel Psychology, 31, 206–213.Google Scholar
Guion, R. M. (1977). Content validity–the source of my discontent. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., Pink, J. E., Meinz, E. J., Pettibone, J. C., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). The roles of ability, personality, and interests in acquiring current events knowledge: A longitudinal study. Intelligence, 36, 261–278.Google Scholar
Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (1999). An analysis of variance approach to content validation. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 175–186.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. J., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., & Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555–566.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657–690.Google Scholar
Kleiman, L. S., & Faley, R. H. (1978). Assessing content validity: Standards set by the court. Personnel Psychology, 31, 701–713.Google Scholar
Landy, F. J. (1986). Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. American Psychologist, 41, 1183–1192.Google Scholar
Legree, P. J., Pifer, M. E., & Grafton, F. C. (1996). Correlations among cognitive abilities are lower for higher ability groups. Intelligence, 23, 45–57.Google Scholar
Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192–211.Google Scholar
Motowidlo, S. J., Hooper, A. C., & Jackson, H. L. (2006). Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 749–761.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2009). Content validation is useful for many things, but validity isn't one of them. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 453–464.Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Schmitt, N., Kim, B. H., Ramsay, L. J., & Gillespie, M. A. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 187–207.Google Scholar
Prien, E. P. (1977). The function of job analysis in content validation. Personnel Psychology, 30, 167–174.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. C., & Wang, M. D. (1969). Restrictions on the possible values of r 12 given r 13 and r 23 . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 579–581.Google Scholar
Wollack, S. (1976). Content validity: Its legal and psychometric basis. Public Personnel Management, 5, 397–408.Google Scholar
Yeo, G. B., & Neal, A. (2004). A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 231–247.Google Scholar