Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:47:25.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Challenging Some Basic Assumptions About Psychology and Executive Coaching: Who Knows Best, Who Is the Client, and What Are the Goals of Executive Coaching?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Lewis R. Stern*
Affiliation:
Institute of Coaching
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Three Russell Square, 1505 Massachusetts Avenue, Lexington, MA 02420

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

President: Stern Consulting; Advisor: Institute of Coaching, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Co-Leader: The Executive Coaching Forum.

References

Executive Coaching Forum. (2008). The executive coaching handbook: Principles and guidelines for a successful coaching partnership (4th ed.). Boston: The Executive Coaching Forum. Retrieved from www.executivecoachingforum.com.Google Scholar
Global Coaching Community. (2008). Dublin declaration on coaching: Research appendix.Google Scholar
Kauffman, C., & Coutu, D. ((2009). January). The realities of executive coaching. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Kauffman, C. M., Russell, S. G., & Bush, M. W. (Eds.). (2008). 100 coaching research proposal abstracts. International coaching research forum. Cambridge, MA: The Coaching and Positive Psychology Initiative, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and The Foundation of Coaching.Google Scholar
McKenna, D. D., & Davis, S. L. (2009). Hidden in plain sight: The active ingredients of executive coaching. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 244260.Google Scholar