Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:11:43.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Canada

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  24 May 2007 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — NAFTA, Article 1116 — Claim by an investor as a party on its own behalf — NAFTA, Article 1117 — Claim by an investor on behalf of an enterprise — Limitation period for claims — Effect of continuing conduct on limitation period — Establishment of damages not precursor to submitting a claim

Jurisdiction — NAFTA, Articles 1116 and Article 1117 as different grounds for claims — Different grounds for claim and implications for substance of claims or right of parties — Whether investor may claim for losses incurred by subsidiary

Jurisdiction — Damages, demonstration of at jurisdictional phase — Whether separation of causation and damages appropriate — Jurisdiction established where prima facie case of damages shown

State responsibility — Attribution — NAFTA, Articles 1102 and 1105 — Parties to NAFTA — Distinction between the State and monopolies and enterprises — ILC Articles on State Responsibility — Whether Article 4 of ILC Articles applies to NAFTA obligations — NAFTA, Chapters 11 and 15 — ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Article 55

State responsibility — Attribution — ILC Articles on State Responsibility — Whether Article 5 of ILC Articles applied to actions of State monopoly — Whether NAFTA a special regime of international law — “Residual character” of Article 5 of ILC Draft Articles

State responsibility — Attribution — NAFTA, Articles 1102 and 1105 — Exercise of governmental authority by monopoly or enterprise — Whether commercial decisions have governmental character

NAFTA — National treatment — NAFTA, Article 1102 — Meaning of “like circumstances” — Postal services as distinct from courier services — Effect of competitive relationship between investors on establishing “like circumstances” — Effect of international regulations on establishing “like circumstances” — Kyoto Convention to Standardize Customs Procedures and Policies

NAFTA — NAFTA obligations — NAFTA, Articles 1502(3)(a) and 1503(2) — Party’s obligation to ensure that State enterprises not act inconsistently with its NAFTA obligations — Scope of regulatory, administrative or other governmental authority by State enterprises and monopolies — Whether actions of State enterprise constitute commercial decisions or decisions with governmental character

NAFTA — National treatment, exceptions to — NAFTA, Article 1108(7) — Procurement exception — Meaning of “procurement” — NAFTA, Article 2106 and Annex 2106 — Cultural heritage industries exception — NAFTA, Article 1108 — “Subsidies” exception — Whether payments to entity constitute subsidy

Jurisdiction — Specificity of claims — Failure to provide sufficient specification

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)