Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:16:12.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

United Mexican States v. Feldman Karpa

Canada, Ontario Court of Appeal..  11 January 2005 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Annulment — Grounds for annulment of award by national court — UNCITRAL Model Law, Article 34 — Review limited to traditional jurisdictional grounds

Jurisdiction — Review of award — Jurisdiction to apply provisions not raised during the course of arbitration — NAFTA Article 2105

Procedure — Disclosure of confidential information — Adverse inference from failure to provide additional information after some production — Burden of responding to a prima facie case made by the claimant — UNCITRAL Model Law, Article 34 — NAFTA Article 2105

Arbitration — Standard of review — Scope of review — Comity — Appropriate degree of deference to international arbitral awards — Expertise of commercial arbitrators — Breach of public policy — UNCITRAL Model Law, Article 34(2)(b)(ii) — Assessment of damages

Type
Case Report
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)