Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:03:18.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helnan International Hotels A/S v. The Arab Republic of Egypt

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  17 October 2006 ; 03 July 2008 ; 14 June 2010 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Evidence — Production of evidence — Request for evidence from another ICSID dispute — ICSID Convention, Article 43 — IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration, Article 3

Jurisdiction — Jurisdiction ratione temporis — Distinction between “divergences” and “disputes” — Criteria for “crystallization” of disputes — Whether dispute crystallized after entry into force of the BIT — Whether modification of contract affects crystallization of dispute

Jurisdiction — Jurisdiction ratione materiae — ICSID Convention, Article 25(1) — Definition of investment — Conditions for a contract to be an investment

Jurisdiction — Jurisdiction ratione personae — ICSID tribunal’s duty to resolve jurisdictional issue — Attribution of acts of a state-owned company to the State — ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Article 5 — Whether state-owned company exercised governmental authority

Jurisdiction — Objections to jurisdiction raised in merits phase — ICSID Arbitration Rules, Rule 41(1) — Whether delay in jurisdictional objection constitutes waiver — ICSID Convention, Article 25(1) — Requirement that dispute arises out of an investment — Whether jurisdiction if investment ceases to exist

Admissibility — Res judicata, conditions of — Whether domestic arbitral award has res judicata effect in ICSID proceedings — Effect on ICSID proceedings of award’s recognition under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards

State responsibility — Suspicious conduct of authorities — Whether inappropriate conduct of authorities sufficient to establish breach of BIT obligations — Contractual nature of allocation of responsibility for actions or omissions

Jurisdiction — Exhaustion of local remedies — Whether exhaustion of local remedies a pre-condition to BIT arbitration

Foreign investment — Fair and equitable treatment — Whether recourse to domestic arbitration of investor’s partner a breach of the BIT — Investor’s freedom to appoint arbitrator — Whether enforcement of domestic arbitration award a breach of the BIT

Foreign investment — Fair and equitable treatment — Relations between parties to a contract — Whether less favourable treatment of investor by contractual partner a breach of the BIT — Whether control by State sufficient to attribute conduct of state-owned company to State — Whether conduct being a coordinated plan by State against investor — Contractual rights and treaty rights

Expropriation — Termination of contract as expropriation — Involvement of state authorities in plan aimed at termination of contract — Whether investor’s failure to challenge authorities’ conduct in domestic courts disqualified BIT expropriation claim

Costs — Allocation of costs between parties — ICSID Convention, Article 61(2) — Rule 28 of the ICSID Arbitration Rules — Specific criteria for allocation of costs

Annulment — Function of annulment committee — ICSID Convention, Article 52 — No reconsideration of findings of fact

Annulment — Serious departure from a fundamental rule of procedure — ICSID Arbitration Rules, Rule 34(1) — Evaluation of evidence presented by the parties — Opportunity for parties to present their case — Tribunal’s right to reach its own conclusions as to interpretation and weight of evidence

Annulment — Failure to state reasons — ICSID Convention, Article 52(1)(e) — No requirement to discuss every argument raised by parties

Annulment — Manifest excess of powers — ICSID Convention, Article 52(1)(b) — Scope of ICSID tribunal’s powers based on agreement of parties — Failure to decide a question entrusted to the tribunal as manifest excess of powers — Intention of States parties to BIT

Annulment — Exhaustion of local remedies — Whether exhaustion of local remedies pre-condition to BIT arbitration — Reliance on prior ICSID award where facts different — Effects of requirement of exhaustion of local remedies on ICSID arbitration

Annulment — Annulment of part of the award — Effect on the award

Annulment — Manifest excess of powers — ICSID Convention, Article 52(1)(b) — Distinction between breach of treaty and breach of contract — Reliance by ICSID tribunal on domestic arbitration to analyse alleged breach of treaty

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)