Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:09:54.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consortium Groupement LESI-DIPENTA v. People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  10 January 2005 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2020

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — ICSID Convention, Article 25 — Meaning of legal dispute — Whether amount of compensation a legal dispute — Meaning of investment — Whether contract can be an investment — Conditions for contract to be an investment — Whether contribution by contractor can be in home country — Nature of contribution required — Duration of contract — Risk implied in contract — Requirement of a dispute with a State

Jurisdiction — Consent to ICSID jurisdiction — Scope of consent limited by Article 4 of Algeria-Italy Bilateral Investment Treaty, 1991

Admissibility — Algeria-Italy Bilateral Investment Treaty, 1991, Article 8 — Requirement of attempts at prior friendly settlement — Cooling-off period — Date from which cooling-off period running

Admissibility — Standing — Whether Consortium party to contract — Whether creation of Consortium notified to Algeria — Whether Consortium accepted by Algeria — Whether Consortium an agent for member companies — Whether Consortium can assert rights of member companies

Costs — Discretion of Tribunal — Inadmissible claim — Rejection of most of Respondent’s objections

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)