Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:27:28.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yaung Chi Oo Trading Pte Ltd v. Government of the Union of Myanmar

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  27 February 2002 ; 31 March 2003 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Provisional measures — Standard of jurisdiction required — Prima facie standard

Provisional measures — Application for discovery of evidence — Requirement of specificity

Provisional measures — Purpose to safeguard the interests of the parties — Whether provisional measures are appropriate where loss could be compensated by monetary damages

Jurisdiction — Privity — Whether mutuality of consent existed — Whether treaty in force at time of claim

Jurisdiction — Exhaustion of local and contractual remedies — Differences between international commercial arbitration under treaty and local actions under municipal law — Whether any treaty requirement to exhaust other remedies existed

Interpretation — ASEAN Investment Agreement, 1987 — Interpretation of “investment” — Whether there was a direct inward investment from another Member State — Whether the investing company was effectively managed from the State of incorporation — Presumption against loss of treaty protection — Whether investment was approved in writing and registered

Interpretation — ASEAN Framework Agreement, 1998 — Interpretation of “ASEAN investment” — Relation to the 1987 Agreement — Whether intended to amend the earlier treaty or operate cumulatively — Whether concepts of investment were distinct — Relevance of State practice in ASEAN — Object and purpose of treaty

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)