Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:21:18.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women in Philosophy: The Costs of Exclusion—Editor's Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Alison Wylie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Women in Philosophy
Information
Hypatia , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , Spring 2011 , pp. 374 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín, ed. 2003. Singing in the fire: Stories of women in philosophy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2009. The undergraduate pipeline problem. Hypatia 24 (1): 216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Carla. 2011. What is in it for me? The benefits of diversity in scientific communities. In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge, ed. Grasswick, Heidi. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuck, Valerie J. 2010. Progress of women in academic science. Chemical and Engineering News 88 (42): 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2005. Women philosophers, sidelined challenges, and professional philosophy. Hypatia 20 (3): 149–52.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 2005. “Ideal theory” as ideology. Hypatia 20 (3): 165–84.Google Scholar
MIT Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Science. 1999. A study of the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Special edition of The MIT Faculty Newsletter 11 (4): http://web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.html (accessed January 5, 2011).Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. 2007. Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu (accessed October 21, 2010).Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2010. Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.Google Scholar
Nelson, Donna J. 2005. A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities . http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity%20Report%20Final.pdf (updated October 20, 2007; accessed October 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Norlock, Kate. 2009. Love to count: Arguments for inaccurately measuring the proportion of philosophers who are women. APA Newsletter, Feminism and Philosophy 8 (2): 6–9. http://www.apaonline.org/publications/newsletters/v08n2_Feminism_06.aspx (accessed October 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Richardson, Sarah S. 2010. Feminist philosophy of science: History, contributions, and challenges. Synthese 177:337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 2011. The marginalization of feminist epistemology and what that reveals about epistemology ‘proper.’ In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge, ed. Grasswick, Heidi. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mary. 1974. Saturn's rings: A study of the minutiae of sexism which maintain discrimination and inhibit affirmative action results in corporations and non‐profit institutions. In Graduate and Professional Education of Women. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mary. 1990. Barriers to equality: The power of subtle discrimination. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 3 (2): 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Bernice R. 1986. The campus climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Washington, D.C.: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.Google Scholar
Solomon, Miriam, and Clark, John. 2006. Some demographics of the PSA. Report to the Philosophy of Science Women's Caucus, November 2006.Google Scholar
Solomon, Miriam, and Clark, John. 2009. CSW jobs for philosophers employment Study. APA Newsletter, Feminism and Philosophy 8 (2): 3–6. http://www.apaonline.org/publications/newsletters/v08n2_Feminism_index.aspx (accessed October 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Solomon, Miriam, and Clark, John. 2010. Demographics of the PSA 2010. Report to the philosophy of science women's caucus, November 2010.Google Scholar
Townsend, Robert B. 2010. What the data reveal about women historians. Perspectives on history, American Historical Association. http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2010/1005/1005pro1.cfm (posted May 2010, accessed October 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Turner, Caroline Sotello Viernes. 2002. Diversifying the faculty: A guidebook for search committees. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
Valian, Virginia. 1999. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Camp, Julie. 2010. Tenured/tenure‐track faculty women at 98 U.S. doctoral programs in philosophy. https://www.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/doctoral_2004.html (updated August 25, 2010; accessed October 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 2005. Diotima's ghost: The uncertain place of feminist philosophy in professional philosophy. Hypatia 20 (3): 153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Martha S., and Curtis, John W. 2006. AAUP faculty gender equity indicators. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Professors. http://www.aaup.org (accessed December 20, 2010).Google Scholar
What is it like to be a woman in philosophy? http://beingawomaninphilosophy.wordpress.com/about‐2/ (accessed December 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Widnall, Sheila. 1988. Voices from the pipeline. Science 241:1740–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Women in Philosophy Task Force. http://web.mit.edu/wphtf/Welcome.html (accessed December 20, 2010).Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 1995. The contexts of activism on “climate” issues. In Breaking anonymity: The chilly climate for women faculty, ed. the Chilly Collective. Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2011. Standpoint (still) matters: Research on women, work, and the academy. In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge, ed. Grasswick, Heidi. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison, Jakobsen, Janet R., and Fosado, Gisela. (2007). Women, work and the academy: Strategies for responding to ‘post‐civil rights era’ gender discrimination. New feminist solutions (series). New York: Barnard Center for Research on Women. Available at: http://www.barnard.edu/bcrw/newfeministsolutions/. Accessed October 21, 2010.Google Scholar
Yancy, George. 1998. African American philosophers, 17 conversations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yancy, George. 2008. Situated black women's voices in/on the profession of philosophy. Hypatia 23 (2): 155–60.Google Scholar
Xie, Yu, and Shauman, Kimberlee A. 2003. Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar