Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:22:56.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woman‐Hating: On Misogyny, Sexism, and Hate Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Louise Richardson‐Self Open the ORCID record for Louise Richardson‐Self [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hate speech is one of the most important conceptual categories in anti‐oppression politics today; a great deal of energy and political will is devoted to identifying, characterizing, contesting, and (sometimes) penalizing hate speech. However, despite the increasing inclusion of gender identity as a socially salient trait, antipatriarchal politics has largely been absent within this body of scholarship. Figuring out how to properly situate patriarchy‐enforcing speech within the category of hate speech is therefore an important politico‐philosophical project. My aim in this article is twofold: first, I argue that sexist speech, though oppressive, is not hate speech. Second, I argue that misogynistic speech is hate speech, even when it is intradivisional (that is, when it targets only subsets of women). This is important because recognizing that the concept hate speech applies to certain forms of patriarchy‐enforcing speech is another step in clarifying what is wrong with the practice, and how bad it is in relation to other abuses. Consequently, this article provides a more nuanced account of the kinds of expressions that can and should count as instances of hate speech.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Spring 2018 , pp. 256 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashwell, Lauren. 2016. Gendered slurs. Social Theory and Practice 42 (2): 228–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2009. The second sex. Trans. Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany‐Chevallier. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Brown, Alexander. 2016. The “who?” question in the hate speech debate: Part 1: Consistency, practical, and formal approaches. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 29 (2): 275–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Alexander. 2017a. The “who?” question in the hate speech debate: Part 2: Functional and democratic approaches. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 30 (1): 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Alexander. 2017b. What is hate speech? Part 1: The myth of hate. Law and Philosophy 36 (4): 419–68.Google Scholar
Brown, Alexander. 2017c. What is hate speech? Part 2: Family resemblances. Law and Philosophy 36 (5): 561–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2000. Feminism, the family, and the politics of the closet: Lesbian and gay displacement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1991. Rape as a terrorist institution. In Violence, terrorism, and justice, ed. Frey, R. G. and Morris, Christopher W.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Max. 2015. “The best thing about feminists is they don't get action so when you rape them it's 100 times tighter”: Welcome to Facebook and Tinder. New Matilda. https://newmatilda.com/2015/08/28/best-thing-about-feminists-they-dont-get-action-so-when-you-rape-them-its-100-times/ (accessed October 23, 2016).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1983. Right‐wing women. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Lorna. 2014. How to screw things with words. Hypatia 29 (4): 774–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Clementine. 2016. Fight like a girl. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1982. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Freedom, Calif.: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, Cassie, and Kukla, Rebecca. 2016. Ingrouping, outgrouping, and the pragmatics of peripheral speech. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (4): 576–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, bell. 1982. Ain't I a woman: Black women and feminism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991. The Irigaray reader, ed. Whitford, Margaret. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Jane, Emma. 2017a. Feminist digilante responses to a slut‐shaming on Facebook. Social Media and Society 3 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Jane, Emma. 2017b. Misogyny online: A short (and brutish) history. Los Angeles: Sage Swifts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, Wendy. 2001. Building a better race: Gender, sexuality, and eugenics from the turn of the century to the baby boom. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lillian, Donna L. 2007. A thorn by any other name: Sexist discourse as hate speech. Discourse and Society 18 (6): 719–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 2012. Foreword. In Speech and harm: Controversies over free speech, ed. Maitra, Ishani and McGowan, Mary Kate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manne, Kate. 2017. Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari. 1989. Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim's story. Michigan Law Review 87 (8): 2320–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Jill. 1984. Good and mad women: The historical construction of femininity in twentieth‐century Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
McGowan, Mary‐Kate. 2009. Oppressive speech. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3): 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. Situating legal consciousness: Experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law and Society Review 34 (4): 1055–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2004. License to harass: Law, hierarchy, and offensive public speech. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, Katie. 2016. Here are all the times Donald Trump insulted Mexico. TIME Magazine. http://time.com/4473972/donald-trump-mexico-meeting-insult/ (accessed October 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Saxton, Martha. 2003. Being good: Women's moral values in early America. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Summers, Anne. 1994. Damned whores and God's police. 2nd ed. Victoria: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tirrell, Lynne. 1999. Pornographic subordination: How pornography silences women. In On feminist ethics and politics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Tirrell, Lynne. 2012. Genocidal language games. In Speech and harm: Controversies over free speech, ed. Maitra, Ishani and McGowan, Mary Kate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weston‐Scheuber, Kylie. 2012. Gender and the prohibition of hate speech. QUT Law and Justice Journal 12 (2): 132–50.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar