Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:26:18.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Kant and Ecofeminism Don't Mix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Jeanna Moyer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper consists of two sections. In section one, I explore Val Plumwood's description of the features of normative dualism, and briefly discuss how these features are manifest in Immanuel Kant's view of nature. In section two, I evaluate the claims of Holly L. Wilson, who argues that Kant is not a normative dualist. Against Wilson, I will argue that Kant maintains normative dualisms between humans/nature, humans/animals, humans I culture, and men/women. As such, Kant's philosophy is antithetical to the aims of ecofeminism, which seeks to expose and dismantle such dualistic thinking.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , Summer 2001 , pp. 79 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Düsing, Klaus. 1990. Beauty as the transition from nature to freedom in Kant's Critique of judgment. Nous, 24: 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genova, A. C. 1968. Kant's three critiques. Kant-Studien 60: 135–46.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1965. Critique of pure reason. Trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1974. Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. Trans. Gregor, Mary J.The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1979. Lectures on ethics. Trans. Infield, Louis. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1981a. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Trans. Ellington, James W.Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1981b. Universal natural history and theory of the heavens. Trans. Jaki, Stanley L.Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1987. Critique of judgment. Trans. Pluhar, Werner. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1993. Critique of practical reason. Trans. White, Lewis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1996. The metaphysics of morals. Trans. Gregor, Mary J.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Ynestra. 1990. Healing the wounds: Feminism, ecology, and nature/culture dualism. In Reweaving the world: The emergence of ecofeminism, ed. Diamond, Irene and Orenstein, Gloria Feman. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Mellor, Mary. 1997. Feminism and ecology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Moyer, Jeanna. 1999. Kant on nature, beauty, and women. Ph.D. diss., University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan. 1997. The unity of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May. 1993. Cognition and Eros: A critique of the Kantian paradigm. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld. 1996. The embodiment of reason: Kant on spirit, generation, and community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1998. The power and the promise of ecological feminism. In Environmental philosophy, from animal rights to radical ecology, 2d ed., ed. Zimmerman, Michael E.Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wilson, Holly L. 1997a. Kant and ecofeminism. In Ecofeminism: Women, nature, culture, ed. Warren, Karen J.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Holly L. 1997b. Rethinking Kant from the perspective of ecofeminism. In Feminist interpretations of Immanuel Kant, ed. Schott, Robin May. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar