Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T01:30:47.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Are We Talking About? The Semantics and Politics of Social Kinds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Sally Haslanger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theorists analyzing the concepts of race and gender disagree over whether the terms refer to natural kinds, social kinds, or nothing at all. The question arises: what do we mean by the terms? It is usually assumed that ordinary intuitions of native speakers are definitive. However, I argue that contemporary semantic externalism can usefully combine with insights from Foucauldian genealogy to challenge mainstream methods of analysis and lend credibility to social constructionist projects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Analytic Feminism , Fall 2005 , pp. 10 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 2000. Is Latina/o identity a racial identity? In Hispanics/Latinos in the United States, ed. Gracia, J. J. E. and DeGrieff, P.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andreasen, R. O. 2000. Race: Biological reality or social construct? Philosophy of Social Science 67 (Proceedings): S653–S666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 1996. Race, culture, identity: Misunderstood connections. In Coior conscious: The political morality of race, ed. Appiah, Kwame Anthony and Gutmann, Amy. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 1979. Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Foucault on modern power: Empirical insights and normative confusions. In Unruly practices: Power discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gooding‐Williams, Robert. 1988. Race, multiculturalism and democracy. Constellations 5 (1): 18–41.10.1111/1467-8675.00071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The social construction of what! Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hardimon, Michael. 2003. The ordinary concept of race. Journal of Philosophy 100 (9): 437–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 1995. Ontology and social construction. Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 95–125.10.5840/philtopics19952324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Nous 34 (1): 31–55.10.1111/0029-4624.00201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1999. Race, ethnicity, biology, culture. In Racism, ed. Harris, L.Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism unmodified. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mallon, Ron. 2004. Passing, traveling and reality: Social construction and the metaphysics of race. Nous 38 (4): 644–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles. 1998. Blackness visible: Essays on philosophy andrace. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael, and Winant, Howard. 1994. Raria! formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. 1998. Implicit conceptions, understanding, and rationality. Philosophical Issues 9: 43–88.10.2307/1522959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1973. Meaning and reference. Journal of Philosophy 70 (19): 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning.’ In Mind, language and reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1963. Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Zack, Naomi. 1997. Race and philosophic meaning. In Race/sex: Their sameness, difference, and interplay, ed. Zack, Naomi. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zack, Naomi. 2002. Philosophy of science and race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar