Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:03:09.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Waste Culture and Isolation: Prisons, Toilets, and Gender Segregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Perry Zurn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After reviewing the use of isolation in US prisons and public restrooms to confine transgender people in solitary cells and single‐occupancy bathrooms, I propose an explanatory theory of eliminative space. I argue that prisons and toilets are eliminative spaces: that is, spaces of waste management that use layers of isolation to sanctify social or individual waste, at the outer and inner limits of society. As such, they function according to an eliminative logic. Eliminative logic, as I develop it, involves three distinct but interrelated mechanisms: 1) purification of the social center, through 2) iterative segregation, presuming and enforcing 3) the reduced relationality of marginal persons. By evaluating the historical development and contemporary function of prisons and restrooms, I demonstrate that both seek to protect the gender binary through waves of segregation by sex, race, disability, and gender identity. I further argue that both assume the thin relationality of, in this case, transgender people, who are conceived of as impervious to the effects of isolation and thus always already isolable. I conclude that, if we are to counter the violence of these isolation practices, we not only need to think holistically about eliminative spaces and logic, but also to richly reconceptualize relationality.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Fall 2019 , pp. 668 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © 2019, Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Jack Henry. 1981/1991. In the belly of the beast. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Abel, Elizabeth. 1999. Bathroom doors and drinking fountains: Jim Crow's racial symbolic. Critical Inquiry 25 (3): 435–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACLU and Lambda Legal. 2016. Carcaño v. McCrory. No. 1:16‐cv‐236, March 28.Google Scholar
Archibald, John. 2015. A drug dealer's wisdom: You can throw criminals away but you can't forget them. Al.com, April 10. http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/04/a_drug_dealers_wisdom_you_can.html.Google Scholar
Attorney General. 2017. Revised treatment of transgender employment discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964. October 4. https://www.justice.gov/ag/page/file/1006981/download.Google Scholar
Baggs, Chris. 2005. “In the separate reading room for ladies are provided those publications specially interesting to them”: Ladies’ reading rooms and British public libraries 1850–1914. Victorian Periodicals Review 38 (3): 280–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassichis, Daniel. 2007. It's war in here. New York: Sylvia Rivera Law Project.Google Scholar
Bijersbergen, Karin A., Kirkzwager, Anja, van der Laan, Peter, and Nieuwbeerta, Paul. 2014. A social building? Prison architecture and staff‐prisoner relationships. Crime and Delinquency 67 (7): 1–32.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne. 2010. Why not abolish laws of urinary segregation? In Toilet: Public restrooms and the politics of sharing, ed. Molotch, Harvey and Noren, Laura. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, Sheila. 2010. Queering bathrooms: Gender, sexuality, and the hygienic imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Champion, Steve. 2012. The sword into the pen. In Demands of the dead: Executions, storytelling, and activism in the United States, ed. Ryan, Katy. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Cisneros, Natalie. 2016. Resisting “massive elimination”: Foucault, immigration, and the GIP. In Active intolerance: Michel Foucault, the Prisons Information Group, and the future of abolition, ed. Zurn, Perry and Dilts, Andrew. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela. 2003. Are prisons obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
Department of Defense (DOD). 2018. Report and recommendation on military service by transgender persons. February 22. https://media.defense.gov/2018/mar/23/2001894037/-1/-1/0/military-service-by-transgender-individuals.pdf.Google Scholar
Department of Justice (DOJ). 2018. Transgender offender manual, change notice. May 11. #5200.04 CN‐1. https://www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5200-04-cn-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Dillon, Stephen. 2015. The prisoner's dream: Queer visions from solitary. Qui Parle 23 (2): 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, Mara. 1999. “One female prisoner is of more trouble than twenty males”: Women convicts in Illinois prisons, 1835–1896. Journal of Social History 32 (4): 907–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1966/1984. Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Emmer, Pascal, Lowe, Adrian, and Barrett Marshall, R. 2011. This is a prison: Glitter is not allowed. Philadelphia: Hearts on a Wire Collective.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Philip M. 2014. Creating the back ward: The triumph of custodialism and the uses of therapeutic failure in nineteenth‐century idiot asylums. In Disability incarcerated: Imprisonment and disability in the United States and Canada, ed. Ben‐Moshe, Liat, Chapman, Chris, and Garey, Allison C. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Filison, Rachel, and Ciambrone, Desirée. 2015. The two faces of intergenerational relationships in prison. The Gerontologist 55 (supp. 2): 444.Google Scholar
Fleming v. USA. 2017. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3924241/Fleming-v-USA-Defendants-Opposition-to-PI.pdf.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972/2003. Le grand enfermement. In Dits et ecrits I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Freedman, Estelle B. 1981. Their sisters’ keepers: Women's prison reform in America, 1830–1930. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genet, Jean. 1943/1993. Our lady of the flowers. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Gershenson, Olga. 2010. The restroom revolution: Unisex toilets and campus politics. In Toilet: Public restrooms and the politics of sharing, ed. Molotch, Harvey and Noren, Laura. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board. 2016. No. 15‐2056, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.Google Scholar
Gossett, Reina, Stanley, Eric, and Burton, Johanna. 2018. Trap door: Trans cultural production and the politics of visibility. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guenther, Lisa. 2013. Solitary confinement: Social death and its afterlives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanssens, Catherine, Moodie‐Mills, Aisha C., Ritchie, Andrea J., Spade, Dean, and Vald, Urvashi. 2014. A roadmap for change: Federal policy recommendations for addressing the criminalization of LGBT people and people living with HIV. New York: Center for Gender & Sexuality Law at Columbia Law School.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Gay, and Muecke, Stephen, eds. 2003. Down the drain: Shit and the politics of disturbance. In Culture and waste: The creation and destruction of value. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2012. Old behind bars: The aging prison population in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Kamash, Zena. 2010. Which way to look? Exploring latrine use in the Roman world. In Toilet: Public restrooms and the politics of sharing, ed. Molotch, Harvey and Noren, Laura. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kogan, Terry. 2007. Sex separation in public restrooms: Law, architecture, and gender. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 14 (1): 1–57.Google Scholar
Kogan, Terry. 2010. Sex separation: The cure‐all for Victorian social anxiety. In Toilet: Public restrooms and the politics of sharing, ed. Molotch, Harvey and Noren, Laura. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980/1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Law, Victoria. 2009. Resistance behind bars: The struggle of incarcerated women. Oakland: PM Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003. Purity, impurity, and separation. In Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lydon, Jason, Carrington, Kamaria, Low, Hana, Miller, Reed, and Yazdy, Mahsa, eds. 2015. Coming out of concrete closets: A report on Black and Pink's national LGBTQ prisoner survey. Dorchester, Mass.: Black and Pink.Google Scholar
Marvin, Amy. Forthcoming. Transsexuality, the curio, and the transgender tipping point. In Curiosity studies: A new ecology of knowledge, ed. Zurn, Perry and Shankar, Arjun. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Acts and Resolves. 1887. An act to secure proper sanitary provisions in factories and workshops. Act of March 24, 1887, ch. 103, § 2, 1887 Mass. Acts 668.Google Scholar
McCrory, Governor Pat. 2016. Executive Order 93.Google Scholar
The Minuteman. 2002. Ed “Transgender Defender” Kammerer. The Minuteman , November 26.Google Scholar
Mogul, Joey, Whitlock, Kay, and Ritchie, Andrea. 2011. Queer (in)justice: The criminalization of LGBT people in the United States. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
National Center for Transgender Equality. 2015. U.S. transgender survey. https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTS-Full-Report-Dec17.pdfGoogle Scholar
nemec, blake. 2011. No one enters like them: Health, gender variance, and the PIC. In Captive genders: Trans embodiment and the prison industrial complex, ed. Stanley, Eric and Smith, Nat. Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
North Carolina, General Assembly of. 2016. House Bill 2. Session Law 2016‐3.Google Scholar
Parrhesia. 2014. 51 Years: The new life without parole. Tennessee students and educators for social justice blog. July 8. http://tnsocialjustice.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/51-years-the-new-life-without-parole/.Google Scholar
Penner, Barbara. 2013. Bathroom. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Pitcher, Erich. 2018. Being and becoming professionally other: Identities, voices, and experiences of U.S. trans* academics. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutarch. 2005. On the busybody. In Moralia VI. Trans. W. C. Helmbold. Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar
Rafter, Nicole Hahn. 1983. Prisons for women, 1790–1980. Crime and Justice 5: 129–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafter, Nicole Hahn. 1990/1992. Partial justice: Women, prisons, and social control. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Reiter, Karemet. 2016. 23/7: Pelican Bay prison and the rise of long‐term solitary confinement. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richie, Beth E. 2012. Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America's prison nation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Scraton, Phil. 2009. Protests and “riots” in the violent institution. In The violence of incarceration, ed. Scraton, Phil and McCulloch, Jude. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shelley, Kristopher/”Krystal.” 2011. Krystal is Kristopher and vice versa. In Captive genders: Trans embodiment and the prison industrial complex, ed. Stanley, Eric and Smith, Nat. Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Stryker, Susan. 2018. Transgender history: The roots of today's revolution. New York: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Dianna. 2016. Between discipline and caregiving: Changing prison population demographics and possibilities for self‐transformation. In Active intolerance: Michel Foucault, the Prisons Information Group, and the future of abolition, ed. Zurn, Perry and Dilts, Andrew. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Vitulli, Elias Walker. 2018. Dangerous embodiments: Segregating sexual perversion as contagion in US penal institutions. Feminist Formations 30 (1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, Stephen. 2002. Prison provision for trans people. In Respect and equality: Transsexual and transgender rights. Portland, Ore.: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Wiegand, Shirley A., and Wiegand, Wayne A. 2018. The desegregation of public libraries in the Jim Crow south: Civil rights and local activism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Zedner, Lucia. 1991. Women, crime, and custody in Victorian England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zurn, Perry. 2018. Puzzle pieces: Shapes of trans curiosity. APA Newsletter on LGBT issues in Philosophy 18 (1): 10–16.Google Scholar