Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T02:53:09.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal Basic Income and Divergent Theories of Gender Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2023

Olga Lenczewska Open the ORCID record for Olga Lenczewska [Opens in a new window]
Olga Lenczewska*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Religion, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Bear Hall, 5174 Randall Drive, Wilmington, NC 28403
*
Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article assesses the potential for basic income to become a tool for empowering women in the household and in the workplace. Recent debates among feminist political theorists indicate that it is not obvious whether basic income has the potential to push our society toward greater socioeconomic gender justice. I show that arguments for and against basic income put forward by feminist theorists rely on implicit assumptions about how women's work should be conceived—assumptions that are not shared among all of them. I also argue that these beliefs can be sorted into two dichotomies: one concerned with the suitability of remuneration for caregiving, the other with the question of who should be responsible for caregiving. I conclude by explaining the possible causes of the divergences in the views of feminist supporters and critics of UBI, and by recommending ways to arrive at common conceptual grounds.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , Fall 2022 , pp. 705 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, John. 2008. All things considered, should feminists embrace basic income? Basic Income Studies 3 (3): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Janeen, and Kane, Emily W.. 1995. Dependence and independence: A cross-national analysis of gender inequality and gender attitudes. Gender and Society (9) 2: 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Barbara. 2008. Basic income grants or the welfare state: Which better promotes gender equality? Basic Income Studies (3) 3: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Tripti. 2017. Introduction: Mapping social reproduction theory. In Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression, ed. Bhattacharya, Tripti. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidadanure, Juliana U. 2019. The political theory of universal basic income. Annual Review of Political Science (22) 1: 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for American Progress and Movement Advancement Project. 2014. Paying an unfair price: The financial penalty for being LGBT in America. https://www.lgbtmap.org/file/paying-an-unfair-price-full-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Dali, P. W. 1988. Immigration and migration in America: Social impact and social response. International Migration 26 (4): 441–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Angela. 1983. Women, race, and class. New York: Vintage Books/Random House.Google Scholar
Elgarte, Julieta. 2008. Basic Income and the Gendered Division of Labour. Basic Income Studies 3 (3): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Funders for LGBTQ Issues. 2019a. Economic opportunity. https://lgbtfunders.org/resources/issues/economic-opportunity.Google Scholar
Funders for LGBTQ Issues. 2019b. Health. https://lgbtfunders.org/resources/issues/health.Google Scholar
Gheaus, Anca. 2008. Basic income, gender justice, and the costs of gender-symmetrical lifestyles. Basic Income Studies (3) 3: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing a ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Infanti, Anthony C. 2009. Bringing sexual orientation and gender identity into the tax classroom. Journal of Legal Education (59) 1: 3–34.Google Scholar
James, Sandy E., Herman, Jody L., Rankin, Susan, Keisling, Mara, Mottet, Lisa, and Anafi, Ma'ayan. 2016. The report of the 2015 U.S. transgender survey. National Center for Transgender Equality. https://www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/USTS-Full-Report-Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Kevin, Neilands, Torsten B., and Sevelius, Jae. 2013. Transgender women of color: Discrimination and depression symptoms. Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care 6 (4): 121–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kymlicka, William. 2002. Feminism. In Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenczewska, Olga, and Schwartz, Avshalom M.. 2020. Disagree to agree: Forming consensus around basic income in times of political divisiveness. In Political activism and basic income guarantee: International experiences and perspectives past, present, and near future, ed. Caputo, Richard and Liu, Larry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Livingston, Gretchen. 2018. The changing profile of unmarried parents (social and demographic trends). Pew Research Center, April 25. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/04/25/the-changing-profile-of-unmarried- parents.Google Scholar
Longman Marcellin, Roxanne, Bauer, Greta R., and Scheim, Ayden I.. 2013. Intersecting impacts of transphobia and racism on HIV risk among trans persons of colour in Ontario, Canada. Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care 6 (4): 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Ailsa. 2007. Why a citizens’ basic income? A question of gender equality or gender bias. Work, Employment and Society 21 (2): 337–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Ailsa, and Vanevery, Jo. 2000. Gender, family, and income maintenance: A feminist case for citizens basic income. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 7 (2): 266–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, Gabrielle. 2002. Is it wrong to pay for housework? Hypatia 17 (2): 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Pamela A., and Hendra, Richard. 2009. Losing the safety net: How a time-limited welfare policy affects families at risk of reaching time limits. Developmental Psychology 45 (2): 383–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, Charles. 2006. In our hands: A plan to replace the welfare state. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
Nadasen, Premilla. 2005. Welfare warriors. The welfare rights movements in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M. 1994. Gender inequality and cultural differences. Political Theory 22 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Development Assistance Committee, Network on Poverty Reduction. 2009. Promoting pro-poor growth: social protection. http://www.oecd.org/development/povertyreduction/promotingpro-poorgrowthsocialprotection.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann S. 2013. Why basic income does not promote gender equality. In Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research, ed. Widerquist, Karl, Noguera, J., Vanderborght, Y., and De Wispelaere, J.. Hoboken, N. J.: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 2004. Democratizing citizenship: Some advantages of a basic income. Politics and Society 32 (1): 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Margaret, and Ross, Lori E.. 2013. Gender and sexual minorities: Intersecting inequalities and health. Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care 6 (4): 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Caitlin, Whittington, Charlie, and Durso, Laura E.. 2018. Protecting basic living standards for LGBTQ people. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/lgbtq-rights/reports/2018/08/13/454592/protecting-basic-living-standards-lgbtq-people.Google Scholar
Scheim, Ayden I., Jackson, Randy, James, Liz, Sharp Dopler, T., Pyne, Jake, and Bauer, Greta R.. 2013. Barriers to well-being for Aboriginal gender-diverse people: Results from the Trans PULSE Project in Ontario, Canada. Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care 6 (4): 108–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shervin, Wilson, and Piven, Frances Fox. 2019. The radical feminist legacy of the National Welfare Rights Organization. Women's Studies Quarterly 47 (3–4): 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. 2014. A basic income for all. Boston Review, April 16. http://bostonreview.net/forum/ubi-van-parijsGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, Chizuko, and Donato, Katharine M.. 2006. Does caregiving increase poverty among women in later life? Evidence from the health and retirement survey. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 47 (3): 258–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weeks, Kathi. 2011. The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Carol H., and Birckmayer, Johanna. 2008. Social experimentation on public policy. In The Oxford handbook for public policy, ed. Goodin, Robert E., Moran, M., and Rein, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
West, Guida. 1981. The national welfare rights movement: The social protest of poor women. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
White, Stuart. 2015. Basic capital in the egalitarian toolkit? Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4): 417–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2008. For protection and promotion: The design and implementation of effective safety nets. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zelleke, Almaz. 2008. Institutionalizing the universal caretaker through a basic income? Basic Income Studies 3 (3): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar