Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T14:28:33.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracking Privilege‐Preserving Epistemic Pushback in Feminist and Critical Race Philosophy Classes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Alison Bailey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Classrooms are unlevel knowing fields, contested terrains where knowledge and ignorance are produced and circulate with equal vigor, and where members of dominant groups are accustomed to having an epistemic home‐terrain advantage. My project focuses on one form of resistance that regularly surfaces in discussions with social‐justice content. Privilege‐preserving epistemic pushback is a variety of willful ignorance that many members of dominant groups engage in when asked to consider both the lived and structural injustices that members of marginalized groups experience daily. I argue that this dominant form of resistance is neither an expression of skepticism nor a critical‐thinking practice. I suggest that standard philosophical engagements with these expressions of resistance are incapable of tracking the harms of privilege‐preserving epistemic pushback. I recommend treating this pushback as a “shadow text,” that is, as a text that runs alongside the readings in ways that offer no epistemic friction. I offer this as one critical philosophical practice for making students mindful of the ways they contribute to the circulation of ignorance and epistemic violence during the course of their discussions.

Type
Found Cluster: Issues in the Profession
Information
Hypatia , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , Fall 2017 , pp. 876 - 892
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2007. The phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist theory 8 (2): 149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelou, Maya. 2014. Iconoclasts: Maya Angelou. By Dave Chapell. YouTube video, 22:35. Posted May 29, 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okc6COsgzoE (accessed May 1, 2017).Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1990. Haciendo caras: Una entrada. In Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives of women of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation Books.Google Scholar
Applebaum, Barbara. 2010. Being white, being good: White complicity, moral responsibility, and social justice pedagogy. Lanham, MD.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bailey, Alison 2015. White talk as a barrier to understanding the problem of whiteness. In White self‐criticality beyond anti‐racism: What is it like to be a white problem?, ed. Yancy, George. Lanham, MD.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Berila, Beth. 2016. Integrating mindfulness into anti‐oppression pedagogy: Social justice in higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boler, Megan. 1999. Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burbules, Nicholas, and Bert, Rupert. 1999. Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In Critical theories in education, ed. Popkewitz, Thomas S. and Fendler, Lynn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1995. Incredulity, experientialism, and the politics of knowledge. In Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2011. Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26 (2): 236–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Laura. 2014. Creating safe spaces: Strategies for confronting implicit and explicit bias and stereotype threat in the classroom. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 13 (4): 3–12.Google Scholar
Hoff, Bert H. 2014. More men than women victims of intimate partner violence, physical violence, and partner aggression. ManWeb: An Online Journal, May 8.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 1995. Disempowered speech. Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelrin. 2000. The use–mention distinction. Everything2, November 12. http://everything2.com/title/the+use-mention+distinction (accessed May 1, 2017).Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. In Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Berkeley, CA: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Alice. 1997. Making meaning of whiteness: Exploring racial identities with white teachers. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Medina, José. 2013. The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles. 1998. Alternative epistemologies. In Blackness visible: Essays on the philosophy of race. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2006. Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pohlhaus, Gaile. 2014. Discerning the primary epistemic harm in cases of testimonial injustice. Social Epistemology 28 (2): 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sue, Derald Wing. 2010. Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon. 2014. Good white people: The problem with middle‐class white anti‐racism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 2006. The speculum of ignorance: The women's health movement and epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia 21 (3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yancy, George. 2011. Loving wisdom and the effort to make philosophy “unsafe.” Epistemologies Humanities Journal. http://c961210.r10.cf2.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Essay-Yancy-Loving-Wisdom.pdf (accessed May 1, 2017).Google Scholar