Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:00:44.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward an Ecological Ethic of Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Deane Curtin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that the language of rights cannot express distinctively ecofeminist insights into the treatment of nonhuman animals and the environment. An alternative is proposed in the form of a politicized ecological ethic of care which can express ecofeminist insights. The paper concludes with consideration of an ecofeminist moral issue: how we choose to understand ourselves morally in relation to what we are willing to count as food. “Contextual moral vegetarianism” represents a response to a politicized ecological ethic of care.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 6 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Ecological Feminism , Spring 1991 , pp. 60 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Carol J. 1989. The sexual politics of meat: A feminist‐vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum Publishing.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1987. The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. In Feminism as critique: On the politics of gender. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan R. 1988. Anorexia nervosa as the psychopathology of popular culture. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. ed.Diamond, Irene and Quinby, Lee. Boston: Northeastern University Press Reprinted from The Philosophical Forum 17, 2 (Winter 1985‐‐86).Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan R. 1989. The body and the reproduction of femininity: A feminist appropriation of Foucault. In Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan R., eds. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Chernin, Kim. 1981. The obsession: Reflections on the tyranny of slenderness. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1980. The rights of animals and unborn generations. In Responsibilities to other generations. Partridge, Ernest, ed. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 1989. A feminist aspect theory of the self. In Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman. Reprinted from Science, morality, and feminist theory. Marsha Hanen and Kai Nielsen, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supplementary volume 13 (1988): 339‐‐56.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Owen and Jackson, Kathryn. 1990. Justice, care, and gender: the Kohlberg‐Gilligan debate revisited. In Feminism and Political Theory. Sunstein, See, ed. 1990.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a afferent voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heldke, Lisa. 1988. Recipes for theory making. Hypatia 3(2): 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1989. Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan R., eds. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kheel, Marti. 1985. The liberation of nature: A circular affair. Environmental Ethics 7:141–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, and Meyers, Diana T, 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1987. Playfulness, “world”‐travelling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2(2): 3–19.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, Jan. 1989. A defense of meat eating. In Animal rights and human obligations. 2nd ed.Regan, Tom and Singer, Peter, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall. Originally published as Animal rights revisited. In Ethics and animals. H. Miller and W Williams, eds. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1990. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. In Feminism and political theory. Sunstein, See, ed. 1990. Reprinted from Ethics 99(January 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . 1961. Gorgias. In Plato: The collected dialogues. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington, eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rachels, James. 1989. Why animals have a right to liberty. In Animal rights and human obligations. 2nd ed.Regan, Tom and Singer, Peter, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall. Published originally in the first edition (1976).Google Scholar
Regan, Tom. 1983. The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Regan, Tom. 1989. The case for animal rights. In Animal rights and human obligations. 2nd ed.Regan, Tom and Singer, Peter, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Robbins, John. 1987. Diet for a new America. Walpole, NH: Stillpoint Publishing.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. 1988. Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. Feminism and political theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1982. The diversity of goods. In Utilitarianism and beyond. Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, eds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen. 1990. The promise and power of ecofeminism. Environmental Ethics 12(2): 125–46.10.5840/enviroethics199012221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Alan. 1989. Why animals cannot have rights. In Animal rights and human obligations. 2nd ed.Regan, Tom and Singer, Peter, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. As excerpted from Alan White. 1984. Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1987. Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In Feminism as critique: On the politics of gender. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar