Article contents
Social Citizenship From a Feminist Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2020
Abstract
In this article I construct a feminist notion of social citizenship from early twentieth-century feminism in the United States. Arguing that there are four aspects to the interconnection between women's citizenship and social democracy—new modes of citizenship, a socialized view of rights, new spaces for participation, and a female-privikged definition of gender equality—I suggest that such a concept could help us move from a welfare state to a feminist social democracy.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Citizenship in Feminism: Identity, Action, and Locale , Fall 1997 , pp. 54 - 73
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Addams, Jane. [1893a] 1969. The objective value of a social settlement. In Philanthropy and social progress. New York: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane [[1893b] 1969. The subjective necessity for social settlements. In Philanthropy and social progress. New York: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane [[1902] 1964. Democracy and social ethics. Cambridge: The Belnak Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Breckinridge, S. P. 1923. The home responsibilities of women workers and the “equal wage.” Journal of Political Economy 31: 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 1987. The grounding of modern feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Cynthia R. 1993. At women's expense:State power and the politics of fetal rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 1985. Citizenship with a feminist face: The Problem with maternal thinking. Political Theory 13:19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Mary 1987. Context is all: Feminism and theories of citizenship. Daedalus 116:1–24.Google Scholar
DuBois, Ellen Carol. 1995. Taking the law into our own hands. In One woman, one vote: Rediscovering the woman suffrage movement, ed.Wheeler, Marjorie Spruill. Troutdale, OR: New Sage Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. Burghardt. [[1920] 1969. Darkwater: Voices from within the veil. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda. 1992. Contract versus charity: Why is there no social citizenship in the United States. Socialist Review 22: 45–67.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1913. The new mothers of a new world. Forerunner 4: 145–49.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga Maria. 1987. Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, Evelyn Brooks. 1993. Righteous discontent: The women's movement in the black Baptist church, 1880‐1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Kathleen B. 1994. Identity, action, and locale: Thinking about citizenship, civic action, and feminism. Social Politics 1: 256‐270. Lerner, Gerda. 1979.The majority finds its past: Placing women in history. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1965. The second treatise. Introduction and notes by Peter Laslett New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The end of Uberdism: The second republic of the United States. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Marshall, I. H. 1965. Citizenship and social class. In Class, citizenship, and social development: Essays by T. H. Marshall. New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1993. On liberty with the subjection of women and chapters on socialism. ed.Collini, Stefan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1995. The wages of motherhood: Inequality in the welfare state, 1917‐1942. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. Feminism, citizenship and radical democratic politics. In Feminists theonze the politica, eds.Bulter, Judith and Scott, Joan W.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, Barbara. 1984. Women's poverty and women's citizenship: Some political consequences of economic marginality. Signs 10: 209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988a. The sexual contract. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole 1988b. The patriarchal welfare state. In Democracy and the welfare state, ed.Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1991a. Citizenship and feminist theory. In Citizenship, ed.Andrews, Geoff. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne 1991b. Engendering Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox. 1990. Ideology and the state: Women, power, and the welfare state. In Women, the state, and welfare, ed.Gordon, Linda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Jacqueline Anne. 1989. Lugenia Bums Hope: Black southern reformer. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1989. Feminism, marriage, and the law in Victorian Enghnd, 1850‐1895. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1991. American citizenship: The quest for community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, Kathryn Kish. 1995. Florence Kelley and the nation's work. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert M. 1988. The “American creed” and American identity: The limits of liberal citizenship in the United States. Western Political Quarterly 41: 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Robert M 1989. “One united people”: Second‐class female citizenship and the American quest for community. Yale Journal Of Law and Humanities 1: 229–93.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1982. Politics in the welfare state: Concerning the role of American radicals. In Beyond die welfare state, ed.Howe, Irving. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael 1988. Socializing the welfare state. In Democracy and the welfare state, ed.Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 15
- Cited by