Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:37:29.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Shadow of Heterosexuality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Drucilla Cornell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this essay, Cornell first invokes the concept of ‘imaginary domain’ to challenge the legal legitimacy of heterosexism in any form. She then claims that the imposition of heterosexism on the imaginary is a trauma whose severity can be grasped only with the help of psychoanalysis. Second, she argues that we cannot understand or undermine the power of heterosexist ideas without an alternative ethic of love. In beginning to think about a love that would necessarily pit itself against heterosexism, Cornell draws on Jacques Derrida's metaphor of the lovance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Writing Against Heterosexism , Winter 2007 , pp. 229 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Emanuela ed. 1999. Is feminist philosophy philosophy? Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1991. Beyond accommodation: Ethical feminism, deconstruction, and the law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1993. Transformations: Recollective imagination and sexual difference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1995. The imaginary domain: Abortion, pornography, and sexual harassment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1998. At the heart of freedom: Feminism, sex, and equality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 2000. Just cause: Freedom, identity, and rights. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1987. The post card: From Socrates to Freud and beyond. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1997. Politics of friendship. Trans. Collins, George. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1999. Opening plenary: Is feminist philosophy philosophy? In Is feminist philosophy philosophy? ed. Bianchi, .Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1983. Right wing women. New York: Perigee.Google Scholar
Easthope, Antony. 1990. What a man's gotta do: The masculine myth in popular culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1797/1996. Metaphysics of morals. Trans. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. 2004. The new left and the 1960s: Collected papers of Herbert Marcuse. Ed. Kellner, Douglas. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1859/1974. On liberty. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971/1999. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Verhaeghe, Paul. 1999. Love in the time of loneliness. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar