Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:09:47.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sexual Harassment and Sadomasochism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Although many women experience harmful behaviors that fit the legal definition of sexual harassment, very few ever label their experiences as such. I explore how psychological ambivalence expressed as sadomasochism may account for some of this gap. Following Lynn Chancer, I argue that certain structural circumstances characteristic of highly stratified bureaucratic organizations may promote these psychological responses. After discussing two illustrations of this dynamic, I draw out the implications for sexual harassment theory and policy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1999. The male body: A new look at men in public and in private. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Buhle, Mari Jo. 1998. Feminism and its discontents: A century of struggle with psychoanalysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chancer, Lynn S. 1992. Sadomasochism in everyday life: The dynamics of power and powerlessness. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Chancer, Lynn S. 1998. Reconcilable differences: Confronting beauty, pornography, and the future of feminism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chapkis, Wendy. 1997. Live sex acts: Women performing erotic labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chapkis, Wendy. 2000. Power and control in the commercial sex trade. In Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry, ed. Weitzer, Ronald. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 2000. Glass ceilings, sticky floors, and concrete walls: Internal and external barriers to women's work and achievement. Paper presented at the International Psychoanalytic Association Conference on Women and Power, Atlanta, Georgia, 25‐27 February 2000.Google Scholar
Cobble, Dorothy. 1996. The prospects for unionism in a service society. In Working in the service society, ed. Macdonald, Cameron Lynne and Sirianni, Carmen. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1995. The imaginary domain: Abortion, pornography and sexual harassment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dzeich, Billie Wright, and Weiner, Linda. 1984. The lecherous professor: Sexual harassment on campus. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Glick, Peter. 1996. Ambivalence and Stereotypes Cause Sexual Harassment: A Theory with Implications for Organizational Change. Journal Of Social Issues 51 (1): 97115.Google Scholar
Folgero, I.S., and Fjeldstad, I.H. 1995. On duty—off guard: Cultural norms and sexual harassment in service organizations. Organization Studies 16 (2): 299313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1965. New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. Trans. and ed. by Strachey, James. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1997. Feminist accused of sexual harassment. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, Sylvia. 1995. Gender, symbolism and organizational culture. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara. 1997. Sexual harassment policy initiatives. In Sexual harassment: Theory, research, treatment, ed. O'Donohue, William T.New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Linda R., and Larson, Jane E. 1998. Hard bargains: The politics of sex. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkcley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hollway, Wendy. 1996. Recognition and heterosexual desire. In Theorizing heterosexuality, ed. Richardson, Diane. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Hollway, Wendy, and Jefferson, Tony. 1996. PC or not PC: Sexual harassment and the question of ambivalence. Human Relations 49 (3): 373–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, James R. 1997. Eroticism is a two‐way street, and I'm working both sides. In The erotics of instruction, ed. Barreca, Regina and Morse, Deborah Denenholz. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
LeMoncheck, Linda. 1997a. Loose women, lecherous men: A feminist philosophy of sex. New Yak: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeMoncheck, Linda. 1997b. Taunted and tormented or savvy and seductive? Feminist discourses on sexual harassment. In Sexual harassment: A debate, by Linda LeMoncheck and Mane Hajdin. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Loe, Meika. 1996. Working for men: At the intersection of power, gender, and sexuality. Sociological Inquiry 66 (4): 399421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1979. Sexual harassment of working women: A case of discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Paludi, Michele, and Barickman, Richard B. 1991. Academic and workplace sexual harassment. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Patai, Daphne. 1998. Heterophobia: Sexual harassment and the future of feminism. Lanham, Mass.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Prager, Jeffrey. 1998. Presenting the past: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of misremembering. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pringle, Rosemary. 1988. Secretaries talk: Sexuality, power and work. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5: 631–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1998. Unwanted sex: The culture of intimidation and the failure of the law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. 1998. The social edges of psychoanalysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Soble, Alan. 1997. Antioch's “Sexual offense policy”: A philosophical exploration. Journal of Social Philosophy 28,1: 2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terpstra, David E., and Baker, Douglas D. 1989. The identification and classification of reactions to sexual harassment. Journal Of Organizational Behavior 10: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, Sandy. 1999. Gender and sexual harassment. Annual Review Of Sociology 25: 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Christine L. 1998. Sexual harassment in organizations: A critique of current research and policy. Sexuality And Culture 1: 1943.Google Scholar
Williams, Christine L. 1999. Real life sexual harassment.” In Qualitative Sociology as Everyday Life, ed. Glassner, Barry and Hertz, Rosanna. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar