Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:50:29.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeing and Caring: The Role of Affect in Feminist Moral Epistemology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Margaret Olivia Little
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I develop two different epistemic roles for emotion and desire. Caring for moral ends and people plays a pivotal though contingent role in ensuring reliable awareness of morally salient details; possession of various emotions and motives is a necessary condition for autonomous understanding of moral concepts themselves. Those who believe such connections compromise the “objective” status of morality tend to assume rather than argue for the bifurcated conception of reason and affect this essay challenges.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 10 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Analytic Feminism , Summer 1995 , pp. 117 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G.E.M. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1915. Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1943. The generation of animals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1988. The politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1936. Language, truth, and logic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1989. Hume: The women's moral theorist? In Women and moral theory, ed. Kittay, Eva and Meyers, Diana. Stony Brook, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 1981. Rule‐following and moral realism. In Wittgenstein: To follow a rule, ed. Holtzman, Steven and Leich, Christopher. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1988. Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for moral theory. Ethics 98 (3): 472–91.10.1086/292966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1991. Moral perception and particularity. Ethics 101 (4): 701–25.10.1086/293340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1986. The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs 11 (3): 439–56.10.1086/494250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 1993. Moral reasons. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Descartes, Rene. 1912. A discourse on method. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Descartes, Rene. 1985. The passions of the soul. In Philosophical writings of Descartes, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, Robin. 1992. Care and respect. In Explorations in feminist ethics, ed. Cole, Eve Browning and Coultrap‐McQuinn, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dinnerstein, Dorothy. 1977. The mermaid and the minotaur. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1989. Care and context in moral reasoning. In Women and moral theory, ed. Kittay, Eva and Meyers, Diana. Stony Brook, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991. Feminism and philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1977. The nature of morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1942. Philosophy of right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. 1985. The practice of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy 82 (8): 414–36.10.2307/2026397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 1986. What Mary didn't know. Journal of Philosophy 83 (5): 291–95.10.2307/2026143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1989. Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In Women, knowledge, and reality, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1960. Observations of the feeling of the beautiful and sublime. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1964. The doctrine of virtue. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1982. Feminism and science. Signs 7 (3): 589–602.10.1086/493901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1979. The man of reason. Metaphilosophy 10 (1): 18–37.10.1111/j.1467-9973.1979.tb00062.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1983. Reason, gender, and morality in the history of philosophy. Social Research 50 (3): 490–513.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: Male and female in western philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1987. Playfulness, world‐traveling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2 (2): 3–19.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1978. Are moral requirements hypothetical imperatives? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 52: 13–42.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/52.1.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. 1979. Virtue and reason. The Monist 62: 331–50.10.5840/monist197962319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. 1981. Non‐cognitivism and rule‐following. In Wittgenstein: To follow a rule, ed. Holtzman, Steven and Leich, Christopher. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1985. Values and secondary qualities. In Morality and objectivity, ed. Honderich, Ted. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
McMillan, Carol. 1982. Women, reason, and nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McNaughton, David. 1988. Moral vision: An introduction to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The death of nature. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1956. Vision and choice in morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 30: 32–58.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1970. The sovereignty of good. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nightingale, Florence. 1969. Notes on nursing. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1985a. Finely aware and richly responsible: Moral attention and the moral task of literature. Journal of Philosophy 82 (10): 516–29.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1985b. The discernment of perception. In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Clearly, J.Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. Love's knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Miller. 1979. Women in western political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry. 1974. Is female to nature as male is to culture? In Women, culture, and society, ed. Zimbalist, Michelle and Lamphere, Louise. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The disorder of women. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Piper, Adrian. 1991. Impartiality, compassion, and modal imagination. Ethics 101 (4): 726–57.Google Scholar
Platts, Mark. 1979. Moral reality. In Ways of meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1983. Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs 9 (1): 73–90.10.1086/494025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean‐Jacques. 1974. Emile. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1987. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. 1989. The fabric of character: Aristotle's theory of virtue. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. 1987. The Humean theory of motivation. Mind 96 (381): 36–61.10.1093/mind/XCVI.381.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1983. Aristotle and the politicization of the soul. In Discovering Reality, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1959. The emotive meaning of ethical terms. In Logical positivism, ed. Ayer, A. J.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 1992. Woman and the history of philosophy. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1991. Partial consideration. Ethics 101 (4): 758–74.10.1086/293342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1992. Moral understandings: Alternative epistemology for a feminist ethics. In Explorations in feminist ethics, ed. Cole, Eve Browning and Coultrap‐McQuinn, Susan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. 1987. A sensible subjectivism? In Needs, values, truth. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1975. A vindication of the rights of woman. New York: Norton.Google Scholar